Replies

Oh, frog snot.

Stop back-pedaling.

You, by _your own words_ stated that “store thieves, home invaders”, etc” should be “six feet under”.

Every word of every post you’ve made on this thread has been rendered utterly -moot- by *you*.

The person who mutilated the pup *first* invaded the home, therefore, you support a death sentence for him.

Or, as it turns out, you -don’t- because a puppy was tortured which leads me to believe that coincidentally inflicting suffering on an animal during the home invasion, for *whatever* sick reason, somehow confers a “pass” for the perp who now *doesn’t* deserve the “extreme punishment of death”.

“I have a solid understanding of the relationship of God, Man, the earth and its animals, all of which we have been charged with dominion over.”

I actually LOL when I read that.
You are a control freak/power tripper.

You set yourself up as judge, jury and executioner for “road rage”/”store thief”/”home invaders” and then mention *God*?

That is SO rich.

Let’s discuss those “thinking souls” of whom you’re so fond [excluding, of course, those you personally enjoy the demise of, dependent upon your “judgment”], shall we?

“Road rage” first: Does that include an oblivious new teen driver who thoughtlessly cuts you off in traffic?
Somebody who willfully steals “your” parking space?
A guy that you unwittingly caused to swerve a mile or two back and who is now driving behind you, honking angrily?

Are they within the parameters for your death penalty statutes?

Store thieves: Does that include the 12 year old who swipes a Snickers bar?
An unemployed mom or dad who steals food for their kids?

Theft is theft, just as sin as sin, in God’s eyes, you know.

[if it’s done in a Wal*Mart and they stop by the pet section and maim a hamster before leaving, does that exonerate them?]

Home invaders: Well, this one is easy. They should all die *unless* they torture an animal.
Then, they shall walk free due to some random, twisted “logic” you apply.

“Thus your confusion over what is the proper response to someone who mistreats an animal, and what is the proper response to a thinking human, with a soul, who breaks laws that are part of the legal system our Fore Fathers set up after much prayer and under the guidance of God.”

I have no confusion.
My views are -consistent- and *not* hypocritical, unlike your own.

Your “proper response” to someone reaching in your car window is to kill them.
I’m sure God is all for that too.
[that was sarcasm because I’m sure you don’t “get” that, either]

Your proper response to “store thieves” is to kill them.
I’m sure God is all for that too.
[”]

Your proper response to home invaders is to kill them, unless they hurt an animal.
I’m sure God finds that one as...um...”disturbing” as the rest of normal, mortal people would.

I’m also delighted that I *have* a soul.
[You, I’m not so sure of since your parameters for meting out death penalties is so wide and arbitrary]

Your _own words_ damned you.

Live with it.