Posted on 12/17/2010 9:36:35 PM PST by se_ohio_young_conservative
Wow. Do you actually believe the last part of this statement (her not being Pres. Reagan, I'll grant you ;))?
The term “dude” was an attempt to defuse what appeared to be growing antagonism. After posting, I regretted not using “FRiend” instead. I apologize for offending you.
I agree that we, both you and I specifically and FReepers in general, should be able to disagree without offense, but increasingly the discussions about Gov. Palin seem to tend toward rudeness and accusations of ulterior motives. Each time I’ve participated in a thread about Gov. Palin’s potential candidacy, I’ve been called all sorts of names for simply stating my opinion. I’ve noticed the same holds true for other FReepers as well.
Yes, not everyone who posts on Free Republic supports conservatism. It it the nature of the animal that there will be impostors on internet forums. If FReepers need to be reminded multiple times on each thread about Gov. Palin that not all posters are necessarily who they claim to be, then the general level of FReeper intelligence has plummeted since I first joined.
No offense taken at being called dude. It happens to me all the time. Maybe I write like a dude. :-)
May God bless you and your homeschooling.
I agree. I always call Clinton Billy Jeff. It has always bothered me when people have referred to her as Sarah. It seems even more provincial and obsequious when they say ‘our Sarah’. I say either the Gov. or just plainly Palin, more and more the latter, I’m finding.
Would you mind sharing in further detail what the interaction with Piper (’concept of time’) was about? As to the interview with Greta and her explanation of what happened on the Couric interview vis-a-vis the reading question, I agree that her answer was ill-constructed and insufficient. She said in Going Rogue that she had written editorials for several papers long before that interview, and I have verified that fact. The correct way to have answered the question might have been to say jokingly, “Shucks, Katie, I see that you have not read any of my editorial columns on energy in either the Washington Times, the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, etc..” If she missed the first opportunity, she should have had the wherewithal to at least say it the second time. “I was frustrated with the condescension directed at me given that prior to that interview, I had had my views on energy published on the editorial pages of ............” I’m disappointed with her handling of the question in a friendly forum on a second occasion.
Great vanity. It seems that if what many have posted here about her is true then she has a moral duty to run to save the country, no excuses. And over the past year or so many have posted that she was actually all ready running, but just not announced it, and that others are just to blind too see it. If she doesnt run (announce) those past appraisals will look very silly.
Thanks again for a great post. Sorry I am late.
Unlike you, though, I fully support Sarah. I’ve seen a lot of PDS in your posts.
Palin is already more articulate talking about her positions to any audience than W will ever be.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.