Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chronicles of Narnia: Voyage of the Dawn Treader Movie Review
MSMB ^ | December 17, 2010 | Rob W. Case

Posted on 12/17/2010 5:05:17 AM PST by Making_Sense [Rob W. Case]

It is the third film installment of the Chronicles of Narnia series. The film begins in England, where Lucy and Edmund are staying with their “personality deficient” Uncle, Aunt, and trouble-maker, cousin Eustace. Eustace is very snotty, spoiled, loud, and hates his cousins. Eustace’s hatred for his cousins causes him to torment them. None too soon, when a painting of a ship on the wall starts “moving,” suddenly water starts filling up the room and Edmund, Lucy, and Eustace are from that water, transported into the seas of Narnia.

Upon arriving in Narnia, a very large, dragon shaped ship approaches them. It is the Dawn Treader, and the captain aboard that ship is King Caspian. Yet, the purpose which brings Edmund, Lucy, and Eustace to Narnia is unknown to them. Caspian didn’t call them. There is no solid villain to defeat (like there was in “The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe,” and in “Prince Caspian.”). But there is something within themselves that they take into Narnia, and a powerful evil force, in the form of a “green mist” if you will, exploits these flawed personal attributes. Lucy envies the beauty in her older sister. Edmund desires power and a Kingdom for himself (just as he did in The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe), and Eustace is faced with the manifestations of his arrogance, selfishness, and greed in a sort of “fire-breathing” type way. Yet throughout this journey, King Caspian, Lucy, Edmund, Eustace, and the rest of the Dawn Treader crew have to recover 7 lost swords, located on multiple islands, and lay them at Aslan’s Table so that their true power can be unleashed, and the presence of evil, which has the upper hand, can, for the time being anyway, be put in its proper place.

"To defeat the darkness out there, you must defeat the darkness inside yourself." --Coriakin the Magician

All in all, my interpretation of this film is that it is about temptation, and keeping one’s focus on “accomplishing the bigger mission.” It chronicles the struggle between the relationship with the forces of evil and the nature of the self, while at the same time, trying to keep one’s direction focused ahead instead of the personal desires of the moment.

The Voyage of the Dawn Treader also has more of a “magical” element at play than the previous two films. It is special-effects heavy, and is really a great movie for kids and adults. Kids will no doubt love the magical elements within this film, and the adults will see the overall message behind the symbolism.

I give The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader 4 stars. The film is rated PG and runs 1 hour and 52 minutes.

To view a trailer for the film click Here.

For some insight of the more Christian-related aspects of this film, click Here.

To play interactive Narnia games, visit…. www.narnia.com


TOPICS: Books/Literature; Chit/Chat; Religion; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: cslewis; dawntreader; narnia; temptation
I urge everyone to go out and see this movie. Take the kids, or go yourself for the message beyond the fantasy.
1 posted on 12/17/2010 5:05:21 AM PST by Making_Sense [Rob W. Case]
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Making_Sense [Rob W. Case]

We’re planning to see the movie this weekend.

Prince Caspian and Voyage of the Dawn Treader were my introductions into Narnia when I was 11 years old and received them as a birthday gift. The Voyage absolutely captivated me!


2 posted on 12/17/2010 5:13:03 AM PST by exDemMom (Now that I've finally accepted that I'm living a bad hair life, I'm more at peace with the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Making_Sense [Rob W. Case]

sounds like they’re trying to change the story more than they did the second one.


3 posted on 12/17/2010 5:18:11 AM PST by absolootezer0 (2x divorced, tattooed, pierced, harley hatin, meghan mccain luvin', smoker and pit bull owner..what?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Making_Sense [Rob W. Case]

I took my 12 and 14 year old girls to see it ASAP. By the end, the older was crying tears of rage. Out of all the Narnia books, this was her favorite, and the one that looked best suited for translation “as is” to the film genre. But the writers didn’t consider the real story “good enough” and “improved” it with mechanized magic and McGuffins.


4 posted on 12/17/2010 5:19:21 AM PST by RJR_fan (The press corpse is going through the final stages of Hopium withdrawal. That leg tingle is urine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Making_Sense [Rob W. Case]

I found the film to be entertaining, and worth our time (and money) to go see it...

Of course it does not follow the original book storyline to a “T”...No films really do, but I enjoyed the imagery come to life, so to speak, when this and the preceding films came out...

I have read all the books in this series when I was younger, and reading to me, regardless of the genre and content was always an escape for me...I urge the parents in this forum to get their kids to read things beyond what you or others might believe to be beyond their kids comprehension or attention span...I’ve read books many times over in my life, and when I was younger I had been told my comprehension and reading level was way over the age and grade I was currently in...

If these types of stories do nothing more than exercise the grey matter between the ears, and the more you stimulate that the better in the long run...


5 posted on 12/17/2010 5:26:32 AM PST by stevie_d_64 (I'm jus' sayin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Making_Sense [Rob W. Case]

okay :-). love the books . . .


6 posted on 12/17/2010 5:29:26 AM PST by GOP Poet (Obama is an OLYMPIC failure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RJR_fan
I'm so sorry your daughter was upset. I prepared my 12 yo son for such things, and we enjoyed the film immensely.
7 posted on 12/17/2010 5:29:54 AM PST by kimmie7 (I do not think BO is the antichrist, but he may very well be 665.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: stevie_d_64
I never read the books. I knew about them about them from kids I went to church with, but reading books was something I didn't care to do much of back in those days. Now at 52 I made it known that they are on the top of my Christmas List and something I will read and then pass on to my 9-year old. And seeing the movie is something our family will be doing during the Christmas break.
8 posted on 12/17/2010 5:36:20 AM PST by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Shimmer1

ping


9 posted on 12/17/2010 5:59:43 AM PST by null and void (We are now in day 694 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Making_Sense [Rob W. Case]

I remember being a little girl and waking up at about three in the morning to read the series before school. I know, kinda weird. Even though the last of our kids are almost out of the house we still keep the series on the bookshelf. It will stay there as long as I am around.


10 posted on 12/17/2010 6:17:58 AM PST by ladyvet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RJR_fan

I hear ya!

What is it with film makers that they mess about with the tone and the subtext from extremely well-known and well-loved fantasy novels in the name of spicing up the plot?

Take the Lord of the Rings films, for example. Peter Jackson scrupulously avoided walking into the obvious traps, but even so he managed to fall foul of it with Legolas and Gimli.

In the books, Legolas and Gimli distrust each other from the outset (being almost natural enemies), but develop a kinship through fighting side by side, and end up almost as brothers. That’s their story and it was vastly more relevant to the LOTR story in Tolkien’s eyes, than the Arwen-Aragorn relationship.

In the films, Jackson tried to make us laugh at the dwarf not being able to see over the battlements or being hampered by the orc/ogre corpses, while Legolas goes off on a one-man ninja assault.

It’s the only real misfire in that otherwise brilliant adaptation.


11 posted on 12/17/2010 7:09:46 AM PST by MalPearce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: absolootezer0

there are some tweaks and they did cut out some of the end details that would have slowed the movie at the end. Overall they hit the mark.


12 posted on 12/17/2010 7:15:07 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NavyCanDo

Please read it TO your nine year old. I recommend starting with book #5, The Magician’s Nephew.


13 posted on 12/17/2010 9:04:24 AM PST by kabumpo (Kabumpo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg; AdmSmith; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; bigheadfred; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks Making_Sense [Rob W. Case].


14 posted on 12/17/2010 10:15:38 AM PST by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: absolootezer0

I understand why they felt they had to change the story. They had to keep the plot moving, and the way the book is laid out, there is nothing there to merge the events within it. If it was filmed that way, it would probably not make any sense to those of us who haven’t yet read the books.

Yet when these changes are approved by C.S. Lewis’ stepson, who is an avowed Christian himself, I felt confident that he would make the right decisions.


15 posted on 12/17/2010 8:06:56 PM PST by Making_Sense [Rob W. Case]
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Making_Sense [Rob W. Case]

I loved the books and am a big C.S. Lewis fan in general. I thought the movie was very exciting and even a little old-fashioned (like a CGI laden Ray Harryhausen film). I was a little disappointed with some of the changes they made to the story, but a lot of things they got very right (bratty Eustace, brave Reepicheep, noble Aslan, bizarre Dufflepuds, etc.). It’s really a very imaginative story.

Get out there and see this one, folks! We need to support films that actually promote a good moral message for once. If movies like this fail then Hollywood will just continue to crank out more and more garbage.


16 posted on 12/18/2010 9:26:21 AM PST by FenwickBabbitt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Making_Sense [Rob W. Case]

Agree. Love the books. The movie is great. Go see it!


17 posted on 12/20/2010 11:02:32 AM PST by Shark24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FenwickBabbitt

And it’s funny. Hollywood only seems to be playing politics with Christian themed films. In many instances, they have been coming out with commitments to series that don’t rake in that much revenue (take SAW for example, especially after the third one). And that’s not the only one either. And yet, for movies like Narnia, they are going on a profit by film, step by step basis.


18 posted on 01/01/2011 2:28:30 AM PST by Making_Sense [Rob W. Case]
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson