Do we really want general chat discussions about divorce, girlfriends, ex-wives, troubled children, past drug use, alcoholism, business failures, bad school grades, etc to get used in personal attacks to keep someone from bringing up your candidate support for Rudy Giuliani as you troll Palin threads?
If that meets with approval on FR, then it will pretty much destroy the forum as every losing political argument is met with an accusation or dragging in of the most bizarre, unrelated aspects of the personal life, or history, it should be interesting since some posters have been here a dozen years, and many must have revealed many juicy bits of information that can be used as a distraction when they are on New/Activism threads, discussing politics.
I notice that you will not address your support for Rudy Giuliani either, you simply ignore it, and start flailing your arms, and throwing out anything that you can, no matter how untrue, or unrelated, it is most definitely relevant to this thread topic, and why you troll on the threads about our leading conservative candidate, Governor Palin.
As I said in my previous post, I am happy to include links and ask you to do the same. This isn't first time you've pulled out my previous posts, I explained the context of them the first few times you spammed them.
Here's a post with a link where you tell someone to support Huckabee:
To: elizabetty
“Huckabee can’t win - he has gotten most of the votes he is going to get.”
I think that you are wrong to throw your support to McCain, you should support his challenger.
26 posted on Thursday, February 07, 2008 2:45:38 PM by ansel12 (The conservative boat sailed long ago, it is every man for himself now.)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1966589/posts?page=26#26
I've satisfied your request for posts with links now. However, it's hypocritical for you to complain to a moderator when this isn't the first time you quoted me out of context, after I explained my comments. To keep posting them and demanding an explanation when you've already heard it is disingenuous at best.
IIRC, I've also posted your comments about prostitution before to you, with no similar complaint. You made those comments about prostitutes on a political thread in the context of politics and defended them when challenged. Do they meet with the approval of FR? I find it surprising that you want to pick and choose what is off limits from posting histories now, after digging through mine.
I am more than happy to discuss politics and positions on their merits. Or we can just ignore each other in the future.
I want the links to post 55, by the way that post to elizabetty was probably a dig at what was one of the biggest Romneybots on FR, who we anti-Romney posters were dealing with all the time, on many threads a day, Huckabee was the great Satan to the Pro-Romney crowd for mentioning Mormonism.
You remember what it was like with you Giuliani and Romney people don’t you?