PALIN leads Ohio and Wisconsin Rep. Primaries

PPP | PPP

[Anamnesis]

Ohio: Palin 21% Huckabee 19% Gingrich 18% Romney 15% Paul 6% Daniels 5% Pawlenty 3% Thune 2%

Wisconsin: Palin 21% Huckabee 18% Romney 17% Gingrich 13% Pawlenty 10% Paul 4% Thune 3% Daniels 2%

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/PPP_Release_OH_1216.pdf

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/PPP_Release_WI_1216.pdf

[FTJM]

You defended Romney against those dastardly Mitt-Bashers and against McCain. You’re a Romney defender and supporter. It’s cute that you call him by his first name.

[death2tyrants]

That's nice. Show me something where I favored Romney over McCain. (Actually, I'd probably flip a coin to determine which one is better.) Here's something, however, that makes one a Romney supporter:

Are you insane? I say prefer Romney or Giuliani over Palin at this point and that means I have some nefarious liberal agenda? Support Palin or you’re a liberal? Wow. 511 posted on Wednesday, June 03, 2009 3:22:48 PM by FTJM

[ansel12]

No, I have never been a Huckabee supporter, at any level, at any time, or at any stage of primaries. Both those posts seem related to Mitt Romney.

I have a number of posts against Romney supporters and anti-socons such as yourself where I point out various problems with their posts related to Huckabee compared to their man Mitt Romney, or denigrating Christian voters that are socons. For one thing, I really mock Mitt Romney's lack of government experience.

You on the other hand actually desire Rudy Giuliani for President, as an anti-socon, and a Romney/Giuliani fan, you have anti-conservative politics that leads you to troll against Governor Palin. Yes, preferring Giuliani, or Romney over Palin does make you a liberal.

To: dalereed
DU id democrat underground.
Preferring Romney or Giulani in 2012 makes me a liberal?
You're not very good at this trolling thing....
301 posted on Wednesday, June 03, 2009 12:01:30 AM by FTJM

[FTJM]

"To: AFA-Michigan “personally attacking any conservative” I didn’t see any personal attack. Are all you Mitt-bashers so sensitive? You remind me of McCain."

You supported and defended Romney against and over McCain. You clearly didn't flip a coin. You were an avid Romney supporter, probably a closeted one now.

I've explained my comments to you before. I supported Fred Thompson, of the other choices left, I said what I preferred; I suggested she run for Senate.

[ansel12]

I would like to see the original thread where I made those posts.

[death2tyrants]

You were an avid Romney supporter

You still haven't shown me where I said I supported Romney over McCain, or anyone else for that matter. Besides, you don't have any credibility anyhow:

Are you insane? I say prefer Romney or Giuliani over Palin at this point and that means I have some nefarious liberal agenda? Support Palin or you’re a liberal? Wow. 511 posted on Wednesday, June 03, 2009 3:22:48 PM by FTJM

[ansel12]

You actually supported and preferred Rudy Giuliani, and prefer Mitt Romney over Palin, that explains why you dislike her so much, but it does not explain your trolling.

[death2tyrants]

The conniving anti-Palin troll likes to quote people out of context and then make false accusations against them. Hopefully this troll will go the way of earlJam.

[oprahstheantichrist]

"Why? If he accidently beat Barack he is liberal enough that the MSM could live with him...."

Why? Because the MSM will easily squash him like a bug.

[FTJM]

Yes, I did. You’re ignoring it. You supported and defended Romney.

[FTJM]

You were a Romneybot during the primary. Wow. just wow.

[FTJM]

LOL.

[death2tyrants]

Pointing out the hypocrisy of McCain’s attacks on Romney in 2008 does not equate to supporting Romney for 2012. You, however, admitted that you support Romney over Palin for 2012. You tried to dismiss this by stating that you supported Thompson, but your post favoring Romney was dated 2009.

[ansel12]

You were a Romneybot during the primary. Wow. just wow.

LOL, if I was known for anything during the primary, it was for being anti-Romney, since I was one of a handful of the most effective, and prolific, anti-Romney posters.

I think Diogenesis will get a kick out of that claim.

[ansel12]

One thing that you need to insist on with FTJM, is that he show you the original posts and thread links, because he will distort and misuse portions and context of posts to create a falsehood.

Remember that this guy is a liberal/Giuliani troll.

To: Checkers
I’m not a huge fan of Romeny’s but will take him over the others at this point. IMO, Palin needs to go to the Senate. Unless someone else comes along, I’d like to Giuliani run. He has balls, will attack back and would actually get something done.
10 posted on Tuesday, June 02, 2009 3:49:49 PM by FTJM

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2263296/posts?page=10#10

[FTJM]

Let's see...you like Huckabee and don't like Reagan but you do like prostitutes...

•Obama vs Huck - who would have thought Saturday, February 09, 2008 10:06:12 PM • 50 of 94 ansel12 to goldfinch

“As for the Rockefeller Republicans not getting behind Goldwater...How is that so different than the Republican Conservatives not getting behind John McCain now?”

We conservatives are gaining a lot by Huckabee continuing this amazingly successful fight against McCain, yet the party is not being bloodied by it. For all the terrible direction that this primary has taken, this stage of things is a little splash of lemonade from what we thought were pure lemons a few days (or weeks) ago.

"Huckabee says he won't drop out of presidential race Tuesday, February 05, 2008 11:14:04 PM • 48 of 56 ansel12 to isrul

Of course it does, you seemed dismissive of Huckabee as some religious figure with no political motive for running for president.

The fact is that his governing experience is the highest among all candidates of both parties, and especially of the one term governor from Massachusetts."

You weren't a supporter of Reagan and don't want to "return to Reagan"...

To: americanophile “I was an independent during the time of Reagan-Bush. I’m not trying to return to Reagan-Bush.”

18 posted on Thursday, February 07, 2008 7:14:52 PM by ansel12 (The conservative boat sailed long ago, it is every man for himself now.)

You're Pro-Prostitute!

To: CaptainK You are making things up and trying to draw a crowd in to help defend yourself against something I said about you only.

It has been my personal experience in the majority of my experiences with prostitutes that I have stumbled into here in America, that they chose not to charge me. Girls like to have fun and that includes working girls, when they truly enjoy partying with someone it isn’t surprising that sometimes they choose to consider it personal time instead of still requiring payment. You need to be more truthful in your posting.

146 posted on Friday, March 14, 2008 4:17:02 PM by ansel12 (Ronald W. Reagan and William F. Buckley Jr., both were U.S. Army veterans.)

[FTJM]

You defended Romney against the "Mitt-bashers" and McCain. You now defend Palin against the Palin-bashers...LOL!

Do you still call him Mitt?

[ansel12]

This is the ultimate personal attack, how does the non-political posting get into this political discussion.

The most troubling is that by not posting the links you do things like this.

You are mixing up partial posts, your statements, my name and date stamp, to where I can’t figure out what you are accusing me of supporting and not supporting.

Is this supposed to be one of my posts? It isn’t, and where is the link?

In this partial, unlinked supposed post of mine, you seem to be claiming that “You weren’t a supporter of Reagan and don’t want to “return to Reagan”...” am I reading that correctly?

>>>To: americanophile “I was an independent during the time of Reagan-Bush. I’m not trying to return to Reagan-Bush.”
18 posted on Thursday, February 07, 2008 7:14:52 PM by ansel12 (The conservative boat sailed long ago, it is every man for himself now.)<<<

[ansel12]

It seems that you are very confused about a number of things, one is twisting my attacks on Romney into supposed support of him, you are fine with Romney, I am not, you prefer him to Governor Palin, and you actually desire Giuliani to run for President again.

Your refusal to post the direct links to the posts you distort, hides realities like this, do you recognize Mitt Romney's quotes? One of them you just tried to use, as me describing myself (the first one).

Mitt Romney: "I was an independent during the time of Reagan-Bush. I'm not trying to return to Reagan-Bush."

Mitt Romney: "I'm not a partisan politician. My hope is that, after this election, it will be the moderates of both parties who will control the Senate, not the Jesse Helmses."

Mitt Romney:"One issue I want to clarify concerns President Clinton’s “don’t ask, don’t tell, don’t pursue” military policy. I believe that the Clinton compromise was a step in the right direction. I am also convinced that it is the first of a number of steps that will ultimately lead to gays and lesbians being able to serve openly and honestly in our nation’s military. That goal will only be reached when preventing discrimination against gays and lesbians is a mainstream concern, which is a goal we share."

Mitt Romney:"These guns are not made for recreation or self-defense," "They are instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people."

[FTJM]

You have access to your history just like I do. If you're going to post from my history, surely it's fair game to post from yours. If I read that quote wrong, fair enough, my apologies. It seems strange that you would involve a moderator, when you're guilty of the same. But ok, here's a thread.

You posted about prostitutes on political thread about Eliot Spitzer. Bragging about having sex with prostitutes doesn't seem appropriate here.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1985680/posts