Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: All
From the comments at JoNova on the article:

****************************************EXCERPT*************************************

Tim:

If nothing else, we see the persistance of this world-control behemoth that has been incrementally moving toward its goal for decades. It is unmoved by political setbacks, scientific argument or the will of the people. It takes no prisoners, somehow creates bottomless funding, and steamrolls forward regardless of simple facts that obliterate its entire reason for being. It also ignores the damage it is causing to the economies and to the peoples of the world.

Why would it care? In fact this is its goal.

5 posted on 12/13/2010 10:37:23 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: All
More:

*************************************EXCERPT***************************************

Joe Lalonde:

Interesting response being sent by Dr. Judith Curry to the United States House of Representative Subcommittee:

http://judithcurry.com/2010/12/09/testimony-followup-part-ii/

So in one sense, the IPCC process is “working” in terms of garnering support for the UNFCCC treaty. But as a scientific assessment of climate variability and change and the vulnerabilities to climate change, I would judge the IPCC process not to be working. I don’t think that the IPCC can be repaired without a major overhaul of its justification and organization. For an IPCC under the auspices of the UN, I would recommend that the WG I assessment be undertaken under the auspices of the WMO/WCRP (and not the UNEP and UNFCCC).

7 posted on 12/13/2010 10:39:24 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson