To: SunkenCiv
Disappointing that the original article didn’t include pictures of the stones.
3 posted on
12/09/2010 8:41:04 AM PST by
ottbmare
(off-the-track Thoroughbred mare)
To: ottbmare; JoeProBono
> Disappointing that the original article didn’t include pictures of the stones.
4 posted on
12/09/2010 8:42:54 AM PST by
SunkenCiv
(The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
To: ottbmare
Are these the “icca” stones that show dinosaurs on some of them? That could be why they didn't put pictures. They want the sensationalism of discovering something, but they don't want anybody looking to closely at what they discovered.
5 posted on
12/09/2010 8:53:03 AM PST by
wbarmy
(I chose to be a sheepdog once I saw what happens to the sheep.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson