[icwhatudo]

And now Murkowski has decided to vote with the dems on DADT and let open homosexuals serve in the military.

So much for those who said we should not have gone against those two RINOs.

[1rudeboy]

I’m not following you: if Castle votes yes, or Coons votes yes, it’s a wash . . . and does nothing to demonstrate that O’Donnell was anything but a weak candidate.

[Christian Engineer Mass]

Hannity push Rove with hard questions? I can’t see it happening.

I haven’t yet seen a “TV personality” I like.

[central_va]

I prefer to keep my enemies in front of me well marked and easy to spot. I hate having to watch my back, waiting for a RINO charge at any moment.

[biggredd1]

Christine speaks!!! Go Christine!!!!...
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=237473

[WilliamHouston]

Glad he lost.

[NeverForgetBataan]

And Jeers to the reps who didn’t vote like Kenny Marchant of Texas!!!!

[Matchett-PI]

bttt

[roses of sharon]

Rinos are a liability to the Republican party...COD would have been an asset.

Any effort to divert this thread into another bash the Conservative topic is typical of Rino behavior.

Castle is weak traitorous scum, good ridance to him, and thankyou COD!

[CharlesWayneCT]

It already has bipartisan support, Coons will vote for it anyway, and if Castle had won he would NOT have been in the house to vote for it, although it wouldn’t have mattered.

So it’s entirely meaningless.

Of course, so is the idea that a primary challenger would be judged ‘right’ or ‘wrong’ based on how the winner votes. The challenger has ever right to challenge for a seat, and if they win, it’s the VOTERS that do so, and the VOTERS that are then proven “right” or “wrong”.

She would not be “wrong” even if he voted exactly as we wanted him to. It would be the people who voted her that would be judged.

[fortheDeclaration]

Yes indeed!