To: CommieCutter
16 posted on
12/05/2010 7:29:10 PM PST by
DManA
To: DManA
Someone above said it was a scope issue.
I don’t know...the way you posted it sounds hilarious.
21 posted on
12/05/2010 7:31:49 PM PST by
CommieCutter
(A Centrist Democrat is now defined as: between Socialism and Communism.)
To: DManA
Anyone? Am I lying? No, just prevaricating.
To: DManA
Actually, yes, you are lying. You are lying by omission. You omitted the part where she used a different rifle because the one she missed with wasn’t sighted in. First shot with the other gun killed the Caribou. So, yes, jackass, you did lie.
35 posted on
12/05/2010 7:38:42 PM PST by
calex59
To: DManA
Anyone? Am I lying? Yes.
By omission. You are implying something that is false.
Why did Sarah miss the caribou so many times with her fathers gun?
And a more pertinent question. Why is it so easy to determine the intelligence (or lack thereof) of her detractors. This is not a trick question.
36 posted on
12/05/2010 7:39:56 PM PST by
t-dude
(Sarah causes banal and vituperous evil snarks to shriek in horror!)
To: DManA
You do know that bullets do NOT zip downrange in a flat trajectory, but in an arc, and when the scope is knocked off zero, that arc can either be raised or lowered, resulting in shots going high or low.
To: DManA
I’m glad others told the complete story. At least now I know who is bias and who is not.
59 posted on
12/05/2010 8:05:45 PM PST by
presently no screen name
("Thus you nullify the word of God by your tradition that you have handed down.." Mark 7:13)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson