I'd venture to say that to practically all of us the only real thing that matters when talking about any so-called "reverse-ageing" process is not whether or not our gall bladder, most other organs, are rejuvenated, more than likely what we all want to know does it do anything to the the organ most of us want rejuvenated, (this is a family site, no snide comments tolerated :-))our skin, facial features, the skin considered an organ as well.
I say this somewhat tongue-in-cheek but the reality is what we want most in any rejuvenating process is to once again have the body of a twenty year old or whatever age it was that you yearn for most.
1 posted on
11/29/2010 5:55:53 AM PST by
lbryce
To: lbryce
I’d like to live forever - realistically, if I could live to be 120, the biblical age span, I’d be happy.
2 posted on
11/29/2010 5:57:23 AM PST by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: lbryce
Not interested in the least.
I’ll put in my ~80 years on this rock, then I want out of here.
This sort of thing likely appeals most to those who think this life is “it.”
3 posted on
11/29/2010 5:59:30 AM PST by
ConservativeWarrior
(In last year's nests, there are no birds this year.)
To: lbryce
Interesting...
Did the name the mouse Mr. Jangles?
4 posted on
11/29/2010 5:59:34 AM PST by
stefanbatory
(Insert witty tagline here)
To: lbryce
Just what we need, an Obama or a Hillary! who never dies.
5 posted on
11/29/2010 6:04:51 AM PST by
null and void
(We are now in day 677 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
To: lbryce
7 posted on
11/29/2010 6:11:04 AM PST by
Eepsy
To: lbryce
Hurry please. Anything I can do to help?
HEY! Stop wasting time at the coffee pot and get back to work!!
10 posted on
11/29/2010 7:02:58 AM PST by
DManA
To: lbryce
An anti-ageing therapy could have a dramatic impact on public health by reducing the burden of age-related health problems, such as dementia, stroke and heart disease, and prolonging the quality of life for an increasingly aged population.Our long-term financial problems primarily involve an increasing number of old, non-productive members of society relative to younger productive members.
Anything that allows people to live longer just adds to that problem.
I'd like to live a longer and healthier life as much as anybody, but if everybody goes to school till they're 25, works for 40 years and then retires at 65, living to 100, they're out of the workforce for 60% of their lifespan. The financial mechanics of this just don't work.
To: lbryce
Please, don’t tell the politicians. They will either a) keep it for themselves or b) tax it into oblivion.
13 posted on
11/29/2010 7:38:34 AM PST by
NTHockey
(Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners)
To: lbryce
Oh great. Now all of the worlds scumbags and douchehags will live to be 500.
15 posted on
11/29/2010 8:22:02 AM PST by
Hardraade
(I want gigaton warheads now!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson