I read the Hobbit many years ago, years later the Ring Trilogy.
I filed them away as mildly boring but sort of ok. When the Silmarillion came out i reread the ring trilogy and also made the discovery that the real lord of the rings was King Solomon. Seems he had a ring that enabled him to enslave the demons and force them to help construct his temple. Allegedly!
Most of the others are weak attempts at replication of Tolkein’s work.
I prefer A. C. Clark, Heinlein, Louis Lamour, and Asimov to name a few.
Check out the Silmarillion from the view point of how evil spreads wickedness throughout the world.
Caddis the Elder
I read the Hobbit many years ago, years later the Ring Trilogy.
I filed them away as mildly boring but sort of ok. When the Silmarillion came out i reread the ring trilogy and also made the discovery that the real lord of the rings was King Solomon. Seems he had a ring that enabled him to enslave the demons and force them to help construct his temple. Allegedly!
Try reading them again; I have found that some people enjoyed them much better on the re-read.
It’s amazing what sort of myths are told about historical figures, isn’t it?