Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis

Seems line the first thing we would have to do is stop the Chem-Agra people from selling only non germinating seeds. How did they ever get away with that one in the first place?


17 posted on 11/28/2010 1:45:30 PM PST by navyblue (<u>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: navyblue
How did they ever get away with that one in the first place?

I don't know...pretty sad though.

25 posted on 11/28/2010 2:02:49 PM PST by DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis (Want to make $$$? It's Easy! Use FR to Pimp Your Blog!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: navyblue
Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't Clarence Thomas work for Monsanto or was on the board or something. And, did he not cast a deciding vote on the ability of Monsanto to patent life, after which point, Monsanto went about patenting everything and anything they felt like.

While I appreciate Thomas' conservatism and Constitutionalism, was this one decision the one that makes the worst result -

Don't think that people will be willing to trade guns for food, once "they" control all the food?

Sheesh, a woman is supposed to have some magical, sacred right emanating from the outline of the Constitution to kill her offspring in the womb, but you can't safely decide what to put on your own fork that proceeds to your mouth.

Great.

34 posted on 11/28/2010 3:16:50 PM PST by elk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: navyblue
Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't Clarence Thomas work for Monsanto or was on the board or something. And, did he not cast a deciding vote on the ability of Monsanto to patent life, after which point, Monsanto went about patenting everything and anything they felt like.

While I appreciate Thomas' conservatism and Constitutionalism, was this one decision the one that makes the worst result -

Don't think that people will be willing to trade guns for food, once "they" control all the food?

Sheesh, a woman is supposed to have some magical, sacred right emanating from the outline of the Constitution to kill her offspring in the womb, but you can't safely decide what to put on your own fork that proceeds to your mouth.

Great.

35 posted on 11/28/2010 3:17:20 PM PST by elk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: navyblue
Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't Clarence Thomas work for Monsanto or was on the board or something. And, did he not cast a deciding vote on the ability of Monsanto to patent life, after which point, Monsanto went about patenting everything and anything they felt like.

While I appreciate Thomas' conservatism and Constitutionalism, was this one decision the one that makes the worst result -

Don't think that people will be willing to trade guns for food, once "they" control all the food?

Sheesh, a woman is supposed to have some magical, sacred right emanating from the outline of the Constitution to kill her offspring in the womb, but you can't safely decide what to put on your own fork that proceeds to your mouth.

Great.

36 posted on 11/28/2010 3:18:07 PM PST by elk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson