No, we’re going to let you pick our nominee so we can let Obama win 40 states.
“No, we’re going to let you pick our nominee so we can let Obama win 40 states.”
********************************************************
Just make it 45 or 50. Since ou are making things up out of thin air, why stop?
Let me make it easy for you. Just tell us the states carried by McCain that Palin will lose in 2012 to Obama.
The answer: None.
Now, I will tell you, based on polling , the census and the results of the 2010 midterms the states carried by Obama in 2008 that will flip to Palin in 2012, which will give her more than the required 270.
Take the States McCain won and add just six more (in each of which Obama’s numbers are in the toilet) and in each of which the GOP will have sitting governors: Florida, Ohio, North Carolina, Indiana, Virginia and Nevada. The GOP cleaned up, as did her endorsees, in all six states with the partial exception of Nevada where Harry Reid won narrowly but where the Dems lost the governorship badly.
That is 271 electoral votes and with them, Palin is President.
To the PDSers and the “Palin is unelectable” crowd, read ‘em and weep. At this point Palin has a clearer, less obstructed, path to the White House than Ronald Reagan had at this point in 1978.”
And the 271 (unlike your “pull it out of the air” 40 state landslide) is a very conservative estimate, based upon demographic trends and actual polling and election results.
I do not even include formerly blue states that went deep red such as Wisconsin (Tea Party Senator upends Feingold), New Mexico (Mama Grizzly/Tea Party Governor elected) and New Hampshire (Mama Grizzly Palin endorsee wins Senate 60-40 over Dem Congressman)