I wrote this for another thread last week. I believe it covers the subject pretty well.
**************************************
I like Christie but by the time campaign season rolls around hell have made so many enemies even McCain could beat him. Bachman might be good but her only advantage over Palin is her comparative lack of exposure. Once she declares (if she would) the media would drop Sarah like a rag doll nd turn their vitriol onto her. Boehner? Maybe, but again, does he excite the electorate?
Lets face it: Sarah is the only one who consistently draws people to her. That was demonstrated in Harry Reids
hometown of Searchlight, NV a few weeks ago when she drew a crowd of thousands. Days later, he could only draw a few hundred. Granted, he won the election but Ill never believe he did so honestly.
As a high school kid I asked a woman why she voted for a particular candidate. She replied that she just liked him better than his opponent. Logical or not, thats the sort of thinking that elects candidates and I expect the next President to be elected by similar criteria. I believe Sarah is versed well enough in foreign policy to keep us out of trouble, which is more than can be said of the present occupant of the oval office and by the time 2012 gets here shell be a whole lot better liked than he is. If she runs, shell win.
I,like you, think will be very electable baring some really catastrophic mistake or disclosure. Frankly I'm quite pleased they're going after her with such gusto. If she's the woman I think she is it will do nothing more than strengthen her.
Sarah has to go! To the White House!