[Norman Bates]

There was no context. I have no idea what that fragment was supposed to signify, nor do I care (and I'm sure your interpretation is doubly as wrong as it is childish) The fact that you had to go to February 2009 says some things. One, it's not relevant to this discussion. And two, you are pathetic.

[ansel12]

The context is you being a Romney guy, when not preferring McCain.

To: fieldmarshaldj
Are you going to become head cheerleader now for the Slick Willardbots, Norm ? I’d just like to know.

That one I’ll answer: NO.
I took up McCain’s cause because no one else was doing it. He was a vet, a war hero, and a moderately conservative with lots of governmental experience. It’s over and I’m not doing it again. I like Mitt and see him as a fine presidential candidate for 2012 (especially the way the economy and budgetary affairs are). While I haven’t officially settled on him: 1) I will defend what I see as excessive attacks on him, 2) I will celebrate his successes, and 3) all this whining is driving me closer to him. Afterall - I love an underdog.

143 posted on Saturday, February 28, 2009 7:46:06 PM by Norman Bates