Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: chopperman

And that was kept secret until after Arthur’s presidency.


No it wasn’t. The issue never came up because it wasn’t and isn’t an issue.

In 2009, the Indiana Court of Appeals ruled in a Barack Obama eligibility lawsuit which tried to invalidate Obama’s receipt of Indiana’s Electoral College votes: “...we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents.”—Ankeny et. al v The Governor of Indiana, Mitch Daniels—November 12, 2009
There has been no successful appeal of the Court’s ruling in Ankeny.


And when California attorney Orly Taitz attempted to bring a quo warranto claim against Obama in the Washington DC federal courts, the Chief US District Court Judge for the District of Columbia, an appointee of Ronald Reagan ruled:
“This is one of several such suits brought by Ms. Taitz in her quixotic attempt to prove that President Obama is not a natural born citizen as required by the Constitution (see US CONST. Art. II, Section 1). This court is not willing to go tilting at windmills with her.”—Royce C. Lamberth in “Taitz v Obama.”


483 posted on 11/13/2010 9:31:18 AM PST by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 463 | View Replies ]


To: jamese777

The courts will not rule on NBC because its only required of the President and the Constitution only allows it to be contested in the Electoral College and in Congress. This is why all of the court cases against Zero have been thrown out under the grounds “Plaintiff has no standing.”

An Electoral College and a Congress made up of Democrats are not going to contest this. Obama knew this and successfully gamed the system.

Its a true flaw in the Constitution.


485 posted on 11/13/2010 9:41:23 AM PST by chopperman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 483 | View Replies ]

To: jamese777

“...we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents.”—Indiana Court of Appeals, Ankeny et. al v The Governor of Indiana, Mitch Daniels—November 12, 2009
There has been no successful appeal of the Court’s ruling in Ankeny.

... we can add that the Supreme Court would rule 9-0 to affirm this if it DID make it.


493 posted on 11/13/2010 10:07:03 AM PST by WOSG (OPERATION RESTORE AMERICAN FREEDOM - NOVEMBER, 2010 - DO YOUR PART!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 483 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson