[WOSG]

“Justice Gray only “Affirmed” Wong Ark a citizen and not a natural born citizen.”

Which proves nothing, because he wasn’t running for President and they were only deciding on citizenship.

At the same time, there is quote after quote making CLEAR that ‘natural-born citizen’ is just another term for those who acquire citizenship at time of birth.

[Red Steel]

Which proves nothing, because he wasn’t running for President and they were only deciding on citizenship.

You guys can deny deny deny...

However, I destroyed that lame argument in post 224.

Here it is again, to repeat in verbatim:

- - - - - -

To: Tublecane; r9etb

Exactly. They weren’t deciding presidential eligibility in the Ark case, so of course they didn’t say whether he was or not.

What you post is "hooey."

The 1939 SCOTUS decision in Perkins v. Elg did not "decided presidential eligibility," but nevertheless the Supreme Court in their holding said she was a natural born citizen because Ms. Elg was born inside the United States and she had citizen ParentS when she was born.

So, you do see where the Supreme Court said Ms. Elg was a natural born citizen?

And "Affirmed"

224 posted on Friday, November 12, 2010 8:47:33 PM by Red Steel

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies | Report Abuse]

- - - - - -

As we see again, Ms. Elg was "Affirmed" a natural born citizen and that Wong Kim Ark was NOT.

Exactly. They weren’t deciding presidential eligibility in the Ark case, so of course they didn’t say whether he was or not.