Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: r9etb

“There are some around here who see this as inadequate, as it doesn’t say ‘natural born,’ so he must not be a natural born citizen.

Which is hooey.”

Exactly. They weren’t deciding presidential eligibility in the Ark case, so of course they didn’t say whether he was or not.


217 posted on 11/12/2010 7:38:04 PM PST by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]


To: Tublecane; r9etb
Exactly. They weren’t deciding presidential eligibility in the Ark case, so of course they didn’t say whether he was or not.

What you post is "hooey."

The 1939 SCOTUS decision in Perkins v. Elg did not "decided presidential eligibility," but nevertheless the Supreme Court in their holding said she was a natural born citizen because Ms. Elg was born inside the United States and she had citizen ParentS when she was born.



Elg Affirmed NBC Holding


So, you do see where the Supreme Court said Ms. Elg was a natural born citizen?

And "Affirmed"

224 posted on 11/12/2010 7:47:33 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson