Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Steel
So people considered as 14th Amendment citizens are not natural born citizens.

Where does the Constitution define "natural born citizen?"

You can argue common law but that would still make him a natural born citizen.


174 posted on 11/12/2010 6:48:52 PM PST by darkwing104 (Lets get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies ]


To: darkwing104
Where does the Constitution define "natural born citizen?"

It doesn't define it of course. Man can accurately interpret who are natural born citizens based on man's history.

You can argue common law but that would still make him a natural born citizen.

I can go better. The common law of these United States is the Law of Nations for over 200 years, and the Supreme Court of the United States has acknowledged as such


The Supreme Court Opinion Sosa v. Alverez-Machain et al.
No. 03–339. Argued March 30, 2004—Decided June 29, 2004*



June 29 2004 Sosa v. Alverez-Machain et al.


That's NOT English Common law as "Domestic Law" that the Supreme Court has said here.

196 posted on 11/12/2010 7:13:03 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson