Like this clown who claims he read the book but thinks Reardon is the railroad tycoon?
http://gordonandthewhale.com/an-atlas-shrugged-movie-isnt-just-a-bad-idea-its-dangerous/
“First of all, the ideology espoused here is extremely radical. Making a movie based on the work of Ayn Rand would be akin to making a movie about Stalin and his version of communism. Sure, I’d love to see a biopic about Stalin be made. The difference here is that ATLAS SHRUGGED would bathe this radical philosophy in a positive light. Imagine the uproar if a movie were to hit theaters that made Mussolini out to be a hero, a savior, a prophet.”
I wonder what this guy’s definition of “radical” is. Must not be much more than “extreme” or “polarizing.” Because Rand is conventionally known as a reactionary. Politically, at least, though not as regards religion, art, sexual mores, and so on. Certainly, though, she has nothing to do with Stalin or Mussolini, who represent a political and economic ideology directly opposed to hers.
I just read the article and you are right. He is a clown!