Cite the URL please, so there is no confusion.
Lighting in the rocket plume. Cannot be from a plane at an altitude of over 30,000 feet. Absolutely impossible. After launch - Right side of plume bright, left side dark. Only one way that can occur.
OK, I didn't see this one. Could you please cite the URL that supplies the geometric proof?
Geometry of the missile plume bends to the right. That bend to the right would be impossible from a viewpoint of Los Angeles Harbor. You can use the Flight Track Monitor to verify that. The bend if any should have been to the left from the Helicopters point of view.
My understanding of this characteristic is due strictly to explainable atmospheric drift (wind) which matches the atmospheric conditions at the altitude UPS902 was flying.
I'll say this much: You're getting warm. You've got my attention at least.
Do not want that. Just want you guys to allow the process of scientific inquiry to progress without dumping tons of spam onto threads. Claiming there is no evidence of a missile is a lie and is spam.
OK, I didn't see this one. Could you please cite the URL that supplies the geometric proof?
Just take a look at any airline contrail at sunset. You do not need a fancy blog page for that. Use your eyes. Here is one I just pulled off the web and that sun is not even below horizon.
My understanding of this characteristic is due strictly to explainable atmospheric drift (wind) which matches the atmospheric conditions at the altitude UPS902 was flying.
The plume was moving with the general weather system wind which was 25-30 mph out of the northwest. Are they claiming wind shear ? Got to run. Later.