Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: RobRoy

Do you consider the folks at Jane’s to be conspiracy nuts?

But Doug Richardson, the editor of Jane’s Missiles and Rockets, examined the video for the Times of London and said he was left with little doubt.

“It’s a solid propellant missile,” he told the Times. “You can tell from the efflux [smoke].”

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/11/10/earlyshow/main7040379.shtml


22 posted on 11/10/2010 12:56:37 PM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: DManA; RobRoy

Looks like Rush still has his 98.9% record of being right is intact.

LLS


56 posted on 11/10/2010 1:12:43 PM PST by LibLieSlayer (WOLVERINES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: DManA

He must work for the IPCC too.

Even some experts are idiots. On their own subject. It also depends on the context in which the info is presented to them. He may not be an idiot, but was merely set up.

If someone had shown me this video with no preconceived notions, my first reaction would have been that it looks like an airplane contrail - or maybe a missile, depending on the context.

For me to even seriously entertain the idea that it is a missile launch, I’d need more evidence (not mere opinion) than just the video and stills I’ve seen. So far, there is none. Based on the evidence at our disposal, “airplane contrail” wins in a landslide.

Now, if more EVIDENCE presents itself...well, that’s different.


58 posted on 11/10/2010 1:13:01 PM PST by RobRoy (The US Today: Revelation 18:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson