Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

?

Anybody got any bright ideas?

1 posted on 11/09/2010 2:03:17 PM PST by MindBender26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last
To: MindBender26
Anybody got any bright ideas?

The Dems "October Surprise" getting off late?

59 posted on 11/09/2010 2:19:17 PM PST by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannolis. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26

Chi-coms sayin’, “Hai there. All your dollars are belong to us.”


61 posted on 11/09/2010 2:19:40 PM PST by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26

My guess is a Navy test.


64 posted on 11/09/2010 2:19:59 PM PST by texmexis best
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26

It has been determined that it was an SLBM launch by the Burkina Faso Navy to intimidate the United States into removing MSNBC from relay satellites beaming to Africa.


65 posted on 11/09/2010 2:20:06 PM PST by oldbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26

Is a secret something from Vandenburg AFB too far off? It was right off the coast.


71 posted on 11/09/2010 2:20:32 PM PST by bboop (Stealth Tutor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26

Definitely not a hoax, and doesn’t appear to be an optical illusion (sunset contrail).


78 posted on 11/09/2010 2:22:47 PM PST by smokingfrog (Because you don't live near a bakery doesn't mean you have to go without cheesecake.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26

It was most certainly picked up by satellite, and being on the west coast, the Beale UEWR might have tracked it and if so, within a short amount of time provided the predicted impact point (if not an orbital trajectory). I say might due to the proximity of the trajectory and angle.

They ain’t talkin’ because they don’t want to.


80 posted on 11/09/2010 2:23:14 PM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26
Navy is also supposedly bat sh*t over this because there was no acoustic detection of sub!

Environmentalists made the Navy turn down the strength of the sonar to save the whales?

-PJ

82 posted on 11/09/2010 2:23:48 PM PST by Political Junkie Too ("Comprehensive" reform bills only end up as incomprehensible messes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26

There were whispers for some time now about something going down today - 11/9 - a play on the date 9/11.


89 posted on 11/09/2010 2:29:30 PM PST by bgill (K Parliament- how could a young man born in Kenya who is not even a native American become the POTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26

Here’s a theory...or two.

1) China did it to demonstrate their military power and technology while Obama has to cross that ocean to get back home.

2) UFOs took over the weaponry systems on the American sub and fired the missle. IIRC, recently spoke about how in Britain, the UFO’s disabled or interfered with the electronics of our atomic weapons.


93 posted on 11/09/2010 2:31:08 PM PST by DCPatriot ("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26

The lost Clinton launch codes have been found . . .


94 posted on 11/09/2010 2:31:10 PM PST by spkpls4 (Jeremiah 29:11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26

“Terrorists could steal, purchase, or be provided a nuclear weapon and perform an EMP attack against the United States simply by launching a primitive Scud missile off a freighter near our shores,” he said. “We do not need to be thinking about missiles coming over the pole. There are thousands of ships out there, particularly in the North Atlantic shipping lanes, and any one of them could have a Scud missile on board.

“The congressman also raised the question of retaliation – and how an EMP sneak attack could not only go undetected, but that it might be impossible to find out who was responsible after the fact.”

“If it were launched from the ocean, we would not know who launched it,” he said.”

“Yet, over time, an EMP attack would likely result in much more death than a nuclear attack on a major city, he said.”
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=44866


102 posted on 11/09/2010 2:38:17 PM PST by toldyou (Even if the voices aren't real they have some pretty good ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26
Governor Moonbeam Brown trying to get home...


Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

104 posted on 11/09/2010 2:40:32 PM PST by The Comedian (I really missed you. Next time, I'll adjust for windage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26
Navy is also supposedly bat sh*t over this because there was no acoustic detection of sub!

Could it have been an underwater pre-positioned site? I assume the Navy's been out to check... What do satellites show?

107 posted on 11/09/2010 2:44:59 PM PST by GOPJ ('Power abdicates only under the stress of counter-power." Martin Buber /a Tea-nami's coming..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26
I've always believed Jack Bauer kind of stuff is happening all the time and have been amazed we don't see more evidence.

111 posted on 11/09/2010 2:50:38 PM PST by I see my hands (How's that ballot box thing working out for you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26

http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2010/11/09/pentagon-cant-explain-missile-off-california-coast/
(scroll down for video)

At 27 seconds into the video there is an aircraft flying from the right side of screen in the direction of the contrail. I think I saw a light flash on the aircraft. Not sure.

Any reports of pilots reporting seeing anything in the area?


112 posted on 11/09/2010 2:51:34 PM PST by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26
Just spoke with old friend, very senior retired USAF general officer/pilot. Says his contacts, many of whom were his "boys," have no idea what Pacific missile is/was

No offense, but retired, no matter what rank, is probably well outside of "need to know" territory.

118 posted on 11/09/2010 3:03:21 PM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26

My guess is a missile with a leak that had to be launched.


125 posted on 11/09/2010 3:06:57 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26

An idea? I can tell you exactly what it was

The plume indicates a large vehicle launch.
Launched from offshore
The launch vehicle was not detected
The missile was not detected

This implies an expensive launch capability and expensive missile.

This is not a hobbist

This was state sponsored

Question is... Who?

That level of capability reduces the suspects to a handful. Factor in relatively hostile to the US... And that leaves Russia and china

And since china has been pushing their missile and naval capabilities in the last 10 hrs, I would guess china.

Next question would be why.

That’s simple.

They just told us that they can drive up to our busiest port and one of our biggest cities... Undetected... Launch an ICBM size missile... That is undetectable by our systems in flight.

Message? They can hit any of our cities, and we won’t even see it coming.

Why would they say that?

Because they are not happy we have diluted the dollar by 50% in the last year...and now announced plans to dilute it again by another 50%, for a total reduction of monies owed to them by 75%

They basically said, don’t mess with what you (the US) owe us (China)... Or we will shove one of these up your ass


127 posted on 11/09/2010 3:08:42 PM PST by sten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26

there was a scientific article a year ago,(I believe it was on FR also,)stating one of the Scandinavian countries had developed a submarine that could not be detected by any (American) present means. Certainly it could be obtained by some nefarious people.


129 posted on 11/09/2010 3:12:26 PM PST by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-Qaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson