Randi is a waste of time, and anyone who cites his challenge is, himself, research-challenged.
I am not a member of any priesthood,
It's a metaphor for those who are glued to their orthodoxy so tightly, that they are incapable of accepting something outside of their current experience to the point of willful ignorance and even manic denial.
in fact, it is you who are making extraordinary and occult claims.
Extraordinary, maybe. It depends on what your boundary conditions for "ordinary" are. Occult, no. Nice smear attempt, though. Sadly, it's probably the best you've got.
The burden is on you to provide credible evidence and you have none.
See, there's that willful ignorance and manic denial in full bloom.
What research protocol did you use to acquire my credible evidence, and what formal logic did you use to invalidate it?
Empty assertions made by uninformed minds don't warrant much from me beyond an amused chuckle.
I prefer working with guys like Dean Radin and Harold Puthoff.
They get it.
Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.