Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

I don't even know where to start with this dillusional rant...

I guess I'll let all of you enslaved moms out there handle the critique.

1 posted on 11/07/2010 7:55:36 AM PST by smokingfrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: smokingfrog

Pile of dung. I read it to our children yesterday so they could practice their fallacy detecting.


2 posted on 11/07/2010 7:59:12 AM PST by greatvikingone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog

This is the “Fear of Flying” author, right? Enough said.


3 posted on 11/07/2010 8:03:57 AM PST by SES1066 (Thank you for your vote in November, now let us get to work!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog

Really. First, I have to say that whoever came up with the term “baby bump” should be caned.
Second, mothers have bonded with their babies for eons because they weren’t raising them alone. They had this really ingenious invention called a husband/father and often an extended family. However Erica Jong is now and always has been an idiot. She is an adult bump.


5 posted on 11/07/2010 8:09:55 AM PST by brytlea (Jesus loves me, this I know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog

Young ladies, I offer this article as an example of how bitter life can be when one is old and alone. Marry young, stay faithful, have kids - and be happy. Don’t be a bitter old feminist. Actually, it’s good advice for guys, too.


6 posted on 11/07/2010 8:12:11 AM PST by mrreaganaut (Coolidge for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog

Like a good liberal, her own advice didn’t stop her from having a child of her own by one of her four husbands.


7 posted on 11/07/2010 8:17:53 AM PST by HospiceNurse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog
There has been an assault on the family by the left since Marx.

Ninety years ago, the dominant theme in pop culture was the love between mothers and children. FDR, Churchill, MacArthur among others were shameless mama's boys. It was a point of honor. America prided itself as the first nation where mothers weren't expected to have a job.

Now, face it - the Erica Jongs have won. Even here on FR you'll see people glorifying mothers who leave their infants behind to go off to war!

My favorite thing about Sarah Palin is that she quit her “important” job to be with her family. That is incomprehensible to most Americans today.

There are hopeful signs, particularly the homeschoolers. But here in the 21st Century, we are children of the state.

8 posted on 11/07/2010 8:18:44 AM PST by Forgotten Amendments (I'd rather be Plaxico Burress than Sean Taylor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog
motherphilia

Stunningly creepy made up word.

9 posted on 11/07/2010 8:19:33 AM PST by donna (The fruits of Feminism: Angry fathers, bitter mothers, fat kids and political correctness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog
Today's bible of child-rearing is "The Baby Book" by William and Martha Sears, which trumpets "attachment parenting." You wear your baby, sleep with her and attune yourself totally to her needs. How you do this and also earn the money to keep her is rarely discussed.

Live for your baby- not yourself... frickin libtard. Typical single city creature who is aging and finds no purpose in life because it refused to procreate and find meaning in love rather than the ideology of liberal possession of liberal goods and liberal hierarchical status. She is most likely upset because her uterus is a dried up old husk, barren of any support for life... we see this in so many liberal women... Dowd... Paglia... Hillary.... Barny Frank.

11 posted on 11/07/2010 8:24:55 AM PST by Porterville ( I have come here to chew bubble gum and kick ass, and I'm all out of bubble gum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog

“Bearing and rearing children has come to be seen as life’s greatest good.”

Well I do believe this is right but for the rest of the rant she should be disposed of like the millions of babies her sort of thinking has murdered.


12 posted on 11/07/2010 8:25:10 AM PST by melsec
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog

“We need to be released from guilt about our children, not further bound by it”

Liberals hate kids.


13 posted on 11/07/2010 8:25:45 AM PST by y6162
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog

Poor thing. Looks like she does not know very much about mothering and marriage. She has been married 4 times. I must be blessed because I had never heard of her until this thread. Have I really missed anything?


14 posted on 11/07/2010 8:27:25 AM PST by MamaB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog

There’s simply no connection between the lives of baby-collecting celebrities and those of ordinary people bringing up their own children. And also, the writer is a moonbat.


18 posted on 11/07/2010 8:32:00 AM PST by Tax-chick (The alligator ate my friend. He will eat your friend, too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog
Professional narcissists like Angelina Jolie and Madonna want their own little replicas in addition to the African and Asian children that they collect to advertise their open-mindedness.

Well, I agree with the author on this point.

I guess after their careers are over, Angelina Jolie and Madonna will ship their "pets" back to where they came from...

21 posted on 11/07/2010 8:41:40 AM PST by Cowboy Bob (Obama has demonstrated to the world the failure of Affirmative Action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog

In among the dreck, there’s some common sense. There are a million books offering (contradictory) instructions about what every mother *must* do to have a perfect child, save the planet, and win a blue ribbon. I’m sure it’s very stressful for women who don’t have the gumption to say, “No, of course I won’t, but you have a nice day, anyway.”


23 posted on 11/07/2010 8:48:29 AM PST by Tax-chick (The alligator ate my friend. He will eat your friend, too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog
Mother and father are presumed to be able to do this alone—without the village it takes to raise any child.

There we go, again. >:-(

Families are God's unit intended to raise the kids...screw the commune...er..."village" !

25 posted on 11/07/2010 8:53:54 AM PST by bannie (Gone to seed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog

I will never “wear” my children nor will I ever sleep with them past the first couple of weeks. I can’t do it! It’s not for me. There are too many of them and I need my sleep. There were actually a couple of sane thoughts in this article but they were lost amid the “enough abandoned children on the planet to make breeding unnecessary” comments. I am such a breeder!


36 posted on 11/07/2010 9:24:30 AM PST by samiam1972 ("It is a poverty to decide that a child must die so that you may live as you wish."-Mother Teresa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog

Hey Erica, I read the book that you’re famous for. It sucked.


38 posted on 11/07/2010 9:43:05 AM PST by fr_freak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog

You wear your baby, sleep with her and attune yourself totally to her needs.

Didn’t even have to know who wrote this...the above sentence bears the gender bias against boys and men. I have one of each and neither is better than the other nor do I love either one more than the other. Our boy has grown into a loving caring son, brother, husband and father just like his dad and our daughter has married someone just like them. He treats her with love and respect as she does him and our son treats his wife the same way. Love and respect and by the way eryikkah...they are teams and helpe each other. Go away ... you are so yesterday.


39 posted on 11/07/2010 10:12:06 AM PST by cubreporter ( Trust Rush and you won't go wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog
I think she accidentally made a few salient points, but of course, being a progressive fool, comes to the completely wrong conclusion. We picked up "The Baby Book" and I was a bit horrified by the theory of Attachment Parenting. We don't follow the parenting advice in the book, but the medical and developmental information in it is still good.

Of course, she also had to get her shot in at Sarah Palin. Yawn. So predictable, these feminist commies.

43 posted on 11/07/2010 10:16:11 AM PST by thecabal (Destroy Progressivism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog
it's about mothering as appropriated by lesbican fembots which thus precludes fathering as an issue and when a male does pop out then the focus is on emasculating him in his upbringing

and it works...just look at the effete offspring

46 posted on 11/07/2010 10:56:32 AM PST by wardaddy (diversity is only good if you are young and unmarried and chasing women)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson