Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Executive Order--Change of Order of Succession
white house ^ | 11-4-2010 | white house

Posted on 11/06/2010 9:41:49 AM PDT by freedommom

Executive Order--Order of Succession Within the Department of Justice By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998, 5 U.S.C. 3345 et seq., it is hereby ordered that:

Section 1. Order of Succession. Subject to the provisions of section 2 of this order, the following officers, in the order listed, shall act as and perform the functions and duties of the office of Attorney General, during any period in which the Attorney General, the Deputy Attorney General, the Associate Attorney General, and any officers designated by the Attorney General pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 508 to act as Attorney General have died, resigned, or otherwise become unable to perform the functions and duties of the office of Attorney General, until such time as at least one of the officers mentioned above is able to perform the functions and duties of that office:

(a) United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia;

(b) United States Attorney for the District of Minnesota; and

(c) United States Attorney for the District of Arizona.

Sec. 2. Exceptions. (a) No individual who is serving in an office listed in section 1 of this order in an acting capacity, by virtue of so serving, shall act as Attorney General pursuant to this order.

(b) No individual listed in section 1 shall act as Attorney General unless that individual is otherwise eligible to so serve under the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998.

(c) Notwithstanding the provisions of this order, the President retains discretion, to the extent permitted by law, to depart from this order in designating an acting Attorney General.

Sec. 3. Executive Order 13481 of December 9, 2008, is revoked.

Sec. 4. This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity, by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

BARACK OBAMA


TOPICS: Local News; Miscellaneous; Society
KEYWORDS: executiveorder; obama; succession
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
I don't understand why he had to change the order of Succession in the Justice Department the day before he left on his trip. If someone else understands please let me know .
1 posted on 11/06/2010 9:41:55 AM PDT by freedommom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: freedommom

Something is up.


2 posted on 11/06/2010 9:43:43 AM PDT by Shady (The real work is just beginning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedommom

One or more of the people further down the list must be coming along with him on the trip, which he’s not allowed to do.


3 posted on 11/06/2010 9:44:17 AM PDT by BenKenobi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedommom

Eric Holder’s future appearance before Lamar Smith’s Judicial Committee to explain his policy “no justice for Whites, only minorities” as evident in the Black Panthers affair is causing an earthquake in D.C. while Obozo is being guarded by 34 ships in Mumbai.


4 posted on 11/06/2010 9:46:22 AM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedommom

http://www.favstocks.com/executive-order-order-of-succession-within-the-department-of-justice/0427551/

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2010/11/04/executive-order-order-succession-within-department-justice


5 posted on 11/06/2010 9:46:57 AM PDT by freedommom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedommom
Legislation to LIMIT or even abolish Executive Orders should be offered..
EO's fly in the face of the Constitution..
6 posted on 11/06/2010 9:56:23 AM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedommom
The old EO: Executive Order 13481 of December 9, 2008
Providing An Order of Succession Within the Department of Justice
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998, 5 U.S.C. 3345 et seq., it is hereby ordered that:
Section 1. Subject to the provisions of section 2 of this order, the following officers, in the order listed, shall act as and perform the functions and duties of the office of Attorney General, during any period in which the Attorney General, the Deputy Attorney General, the Associate Attorney General, and the officers designated by the Attorney General pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 508 to act as Attorney General have died, resigned, or otherwise become unable to perform the functions and duties of the office of Attorney General, until such time as at least one of the officers mentioned above is able to perform the functions and duties of that office:
(a)   United States Attorney for the District of Maryland;
(b)   United States Attorney for the Southern District of Alabama; and
(c)   United States Attorney for the Northern District of Georgia.
Sec. 2. Exceptions. (a)   No individual who is serving in an office listed in section 1 of this order in an acting capacity, by virtue of so serving, shall act as Attorney General pursuant to this order.
(b)   No individual listed in section 1 shall act as Attorney General unless that individual is otherwise eligible to so serve under the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998.
(c)   Notwithstanding the provisions of this order, the President retains discretion, to the extent permitted by law, to depart from this order in designating an acting Attorney General.
Sec. 3. This order supersedes the President’s Memorandum for the Attorney General of December 8, 2006 (Designation of Officers of the Department of Justice).
Sec. 4. This order is intended to improve the internal management of the executive branch and is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity, by any party against the United States, its agencies, instrumentalities, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
7 posted on 11/06/2010 9:58:18 AM PDT by flying Elvis ("In...War, the errors which proceed from a spirit of benevolence are the worst" Clausewitz.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedommom
The Attorney General has to be nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate. All this is is an order to the Justice Department about who would be the acting Attorney General if an Attorney General should resign, die, become critically ill or otherwise not be able to perform his functions. The The acting Attorney General goes back to his previous job when a new Attorney General is sworn in.

The acting Attorney General is never in the line of succession to the Presidency. For that he would have to be nominated as Attorney General by the President, confirmed by the Senate, and sworn in.

8 posted on 11/06/2010 9:59:43 AM PDT by Cheburashka (She just told me to shut up and get on with transfiguring my raccoon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe
EO’s fly in the face of the Constitution..

Really? How is the President supposed to run the country without giving orders? Telepathy?
9 posted on 11/06/2010 10:03:09 AM PDT by Cheburashka (She just told me to shut up and get on with transfiguring my raccoon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cheburashka

Holder resigning to spend more time with his family while Barry romps in Asia?


10 posted on 11/06/2010 10:05:40 AM PDT by COUNTrecount (Barry...above his poi grade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: freedommom

For starts, just look at who the #1 is now vs. before. The US Attorney for the Eastern District of VA is an Obama appointee as of 2009. The US Attorney for Maryland has been in office since 2005.


11 posted on 11/06/2010 10:10:10 AM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheburashka

[ Really? How is the President supposed to run the country without giving orders? Telepathy? ]

http://www.thisnation.com/question/040.html


12 posted on 11/06/2010 10:18:03 AM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: freedommom

Is Holder on the trip?


13 posted on 11/06/2010 10:28:23 AM PDT by Josephat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedommom; ASA Vet; BIGLOOK; LonePalm

Maybe some foreign intel agency has some really hard, juicey and bad data on Holder, and they are about ready to expose that data unless Holder resigns.


14 posted on 11/06/2010 10:31:45 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION IS DESTROYING AMERICA-LOOK AT WHAT IT DID TO THE WHITE HOUSE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

You haven’t answered my Question. How is the President supposed to run the Executive Branch? (I admit to imprecision in saying “run the country”.) Telepathy? Suggestions? Vague hints? Mumbling?

I would agree that Congress has been overgenerous in ceding powers to the Executive. That isn’t a problem with the Executive Branch, but an abdication by the Legislative Branch. And certainly not a problem with executive orders, which have been issued since George Washington became President. As the URL you provided notes.


15 posted on 11/06/2010 10:36:31 AM PDT by Cheburashka (She just told me to shut up and get on with transfiguring my raccoon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cheburashka
[ How is the President supposed to run the Executive Branch? ]

Answer: He don't.. the people he appoints do... overseen by Czars and other appointees.. They run the System.. Executive Orders are given to bypass Congressional over sight.... in all areas of the federal government as they suborn State rights.. and the Supreme court..

The Supreme court is supposed to determine if ALL legislation enacted by Congress is constitutional.. They do not do that anymore.. they merely now arbitrate rulings of the lower courts..

16 posted on 11/06/2010 10:57:59 AM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: freedommom
Hey Man I'm just saying
17 posted on 11/06/2010 11:01:38 AM PDT by Pride_of_the_Bluegrass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedommom

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4oZPTlI3MEo

Seems appropriate


18 posted on 11/06/2010 11:03:22 AM PDT by Pride_of_the_Bluegrass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedommom

I’d think taking a gander at the political orientation of those bumped up in the line of succession would tell the tale.

Is Holder going off on this grand tour of the Raj? Might want to wear a helmet to ward off kamikazi coconuts if so.


19 posted on 11/06/2010 11:12:16 AM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedommom

Watch out Eric!


20 posted on 11/06/2010 11:18:26 AM PDT by Beckwith (A "natural born citizen" -- two American citizen parents and born in the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson