Skip to comments.
Executive Order--Change of Order of Succession
white house ^
| 11-4-2010
| white house
Posted on 11/06/2010 9:41:49 AM PDT by freedommom
Executive Order--Order of Succession Within the Department of Justice By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998, 5 U.S.C. 3345 et seq., it is hereby ordered that:
Section 1. Order of Succession. Subject to the provisions of section 2 of this order, the following officers, in the order listed, shall act as and perform the functions and duties of the office of Attorney General, during any period in which the Attorney General, the Deputy Attorney General, the Associate Attorney General, and any officers designated by the Attorney General pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 508 to act as Attorney General have died, resigned, or otherwise become unable to perform the functions and duties of the office of Attorney General, until such time as at least one of the officers mentioned above is able to perform the functions and duties of that office:
(a) United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia;
(b) United States Attorney for the District of Minnesota; and
(c) United States Attorney for the District of Arizona.
Sec. 2. Exceptions. (a) No individual who is serving in an office listed in section 1 of this order in an acting capacity, by virtue of so serving, shall act as Attorney General pursuant to this order.
(b) No individual listed in section 1 shall act as Attorney General unless that individual is otherwise eligible to so serve under the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998.
(c) Notwithstanding the provisions of this order, the President retains discretion, to the extent permitted by law, to depart from this order in designating an acting Attorney General.
Sec. 3. Executive Order 13481 of December 9, 2008, is revoked.
Sec. 4. This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity, by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
BARACK OBAMA
TOPICS: Local News; Miscellaneous; Society
KEYWORDS: executiveorder; obama; succession
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
I don't understand why he had to change the order of Succession in the Justice Department the day before he left on his trip. If someone else understands please let me know .
To: freedommom
2
posted on
11/06/2010 9:43:43 AM PDT
by
Shady
(The real work is just beginning!)
To: freedommom
One or more of the people further down the list must be coming along with him on the trip, which he’s not allowed to do.
3
posted on
11/06/2010 9:44:17 AM PDT
by
BenKenobi
To: freedommom
Eric Holder’s future appearance before Lamar Smith’s Judicial Committee to explain his policy “no justice for Whites, only minorities” as evident in the Black Panthers affair is causing an earthquake in D.C. while Obozo is being guarded by 34 ships in Mumbai.
To: freedommom
To: freedommom
Legislation to LIMIT or even abolish Executive Orders should be offered..
EO's fly in the face of the Constitution..
6
posted on
11/06/2010 9:56:23 AM PDT
by
hosepipe
(This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
To: freedommom
The old EO: Executive Order 13481 of December 9, 2008
Providing An Order of Succession Within the Department of Justice
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998, 5 U.S.C. 3345 et seq., it is hereby ordered that:
Section 1. Subject to the provisions of section 2 of this order, the following officers, in the order listed, shall act as and perform the functions and duties of the office of Attorney General, during any period in which the Attorney General, the Deputy Attorney General, the Associate Attorney General, and the officers designated by the Attorney General pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 508 to act as Attorney General have died, resigned, or otherwise become unable to perform the functions and duties of the office of Attorney General, until such time as at least one of the officers mentioned above is able to perform the functions and duties of that office:
(a) United States Attorney for the District of Maryland;
(b) United States Attorney for the Southern District of Alabama; and
(c) United States Attorney for the Northern District of Georgia.
Sec. 2. Exceptions. (a) No individual who is serving in an office listed in section 1 of this order in an acting capacity, by virtue of so serving, shall act as Attorney General pursuant to this order.
(b) No individual listed in section 1 shall act as Attorney General unless that individual is otherwise eligible to so serve under the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998.
(c) Notwithstanding the provisions of this order, the President retains discretion, to the extent permitted by law, to depart from this order in designating an acting Attorney General.
Sec. 3. This order supersedes the Presidents Memorandum for the Attorney General of December 8, 2006 (Designation of Officers of the Department of Justice).
Sec. 4. This order is intended to improve the internal management of the executive branch and is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity, by any party against the United States, its agencies, instrumentalities, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
7
posted on
11/06/2010 9:58:18 AM PDT
by
flying Elvis
("In...War, the errors which proceed from a spirit of benevolence are the worst" Clausewitz.)
To: freedommom
The Attorney General has to be nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate. All this is is an order to the Justice Department about who would be the
acting Attorney General if an Attorney General should resign, die, become critically ill or otherwise not be able to perform his functions. The The
acting Attorney General goes back to his previous job when a new Attorney General is sworn in.
The acting Attorney General is never in the line of succession to the Presidency. For that he would have to be nominated as Attorney General by the President, confirmed by the Senate, and sworn in.
8
posted on
11/06/2010 9:59:43 AM PDT
by
Cheburashka
(She just told me to shut up and get on with transfiguring my raccoon.)
To: hosepipe
EO’s fly in the face of the Constitution..
Really? How is the President supposed to run the country without giving orders? Telepathy?
9
posted on
11/06/2010 10:03:09 AM PDT
by
Cheburashka
(She just told me to shut up and get on with transfiguring my raccoon.)
To: Cheburashka
Holder resigning to spend more time with his family while Barry romps in Asia?
10
posted on
11/06/2010 10:05:40 AM PDT
by
COUNTrecount
(Barry...above his poi grade.)
To: freedommom
For starts, just look at who the #1 is now vs. before. The US Attorney for the Eastern District of VA is an Obama appointee as of 2009. The US Attorney for Maryland has been in office since 2005.
11
posted on
11/06/2010 10:10:10 AM PDT
by
EDINVA
To: Cheburashka
12
posted on
11/06/2010 10:18:03 AM PDT
by
hosepipe
(This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
To: freedommom
13
posted on
11/06/2010 10:28:23 AM PDT
by
Josephat
To: freedommom; ASA Vet; BIGLOOK; LonePalm
Maybe some foreign intel agency has some really hard, juicey and bad data on Holder, and they are about ready to expose that data unless Holder resigns.
14
posted on
11/06/2010 10:31:45 AM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION IS DESTROYING AMERICA-LOOK AT WHAT IT DID TO THE WHITE HOUSE!)
To: hosepipe
You haven’t answered my Question. How is the President supposed to run the Executive Branch? (I admit to imprecision in saying “run the country”.) Telepathy? Suggestions? Vague hints? Mumbling?
I would agree that Congress has been overgenerous in ceding powers to the Executive. That isn’t a problem with the Executive Branch, but an abdication by the Legislative Branch. And certainly not a problem with executive orders, which have been issued since George Washington became President. As the URL you provided notes.
15
posted on
11/06/2010 10:36:31 AM PDT
by
Cheburashka
(She just told me to shut up and get on with transfiguring my raccoon.)
To: Cheburashka
[ How is the President supposed to run the Executive Branch? ]
Answer: He don't.. the people he appoints do... overseen by Czars and other appointees.. They run the System.. Executive Orders are given to bypass Congressional over sight.... in all areas of the federal government as they suborn State rights.. and the Supreme court..
The Supreme court is supposed to determine if ALL legislation enacted by Congress is constitutional.. They do not do that anymore.. they merely now arbitrate rulings of the lower courts..
16
posted on
11/06/2010 10:57:59 AM PDT
by
hosepipe
(This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
To: freedommom
Hey Man I'm just saying
To: freedommom
To: freedommom
I’d think taking a gander at the political orientation of those bumped up in the line of succession would tell the tale.
Is Holder going off on this grand tour of the Raj? Might want to wear a helmet to ward off kamikazi coconuts if so.
To: freedommom
20
posted on
11/06/2010 11:18:26 AM PDT
by
Beckwith
(A "natural born citizen" -- two American citizen parents and born in the USA.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson