Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Ocarterma

I, too, reject the premise.

I see no point in America having two socialist parties, one secularist, the other devoted to some quasi-Christian civil religion (vague enough to form a big tent for protestants and Mormons), and I trust that the electorate will feel the same way come 2012.


47 posted on 11/05/2010 7:37:25 AM PDT by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: The_Reader_David
I agree with your assessment. Two socialist parties, one secularist and the other some quasi-Christian civil religion, is NOT a viable two party system.

Romney and Huckabee are both unacceptable choices. I would refuse to vote for the Presidency, I would NOT in ANY CIRCUMSTANCES “stay home” and shame on any who suggest it. But I would leave my ballot blank on the question of who should be President.

103 posted on 11/05/2010 8:32:47 AM PDT by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson