California and New York are exceptions. Those states are gone - too far entrenched with the public sector unions. If we can’t win there with RINOs this year, we’re not winning out there for the foreseeable future. Period. The NRSC would be wise to not spend another dime out there. We should only target certain congressional districts. If the RGA wants to go for future governorships, they may have poor but slightly better shot, but that’s probably going to be a waste of time too.
I might agree with your assumption about CA and NY, except I live in NY and grew up in CA. We are not commies or hyper-liberals. We have hopelessly entrenched RINO leadership in the Republican party here, and the TEA candidates who managed to win the primary were attacked by them publicly, while they endorsed the Democraps instead.
So, tell me, just whose side are they really on? And it’s not really that much different than what happened to Sharon Angle or Christine Odonnell.
Your assumtion that RINOs win in what appears to be blue-state mentality or even purple-state is incorrect. The economy is a mess and we’ve been strapped with hyper-liberals making the mess larger. Republicans should have won big nearly everywhere Democraps are in power, but they didn’t. So if you can tell me why, without making broad assumptions about the voters that you cannot prove, then maybe I’ll be able to at least understand your logic that we should run RINOs eveywhere.