Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Popman

With all due respect right back at you, it’s high time for our side to stop allowing democrats and the media, working hand in hand right off the pages of Saul Alinsky, to select/eliminate our candidates.

With our own, maddeningly cooperative assistance!!

The process works like this: Liberals identify an individual (such as Newt Gingrich) as a potent, emerging political threat. They’re good at that, because it’s their entire way of life.

Once they determine who is the current most potent potential emerging political threat on our side, they isolate that individual for mudslinging and attack.

They then, barrage that person mercilessly.

Our side, then, FOLDS LIKE A WET BLANKET. Throwing the person liberals want to weaken, under the bus.

Every. Single. Time.

We should be doing exactly the opposite. The moment it becomes apparent the left has selected a specific conservative for an Alinsky sabotage. That INDIVIDUAL should, like in chess, be protected.

Think about a chess game. Sometimes the game plays out such that each player will have 5-deep attack/defense moves all focused on a specific square, even maybe protecting one single pawn.

Because that pawn, at that moment, can change the game.

The left has been taking out our pawns with impunity - and we do nothing. Nothing! Time and again, we roll over and scamper away once the left starts on one of our good people, like dogs which have had a newspaper shaken at them.

We’ve becomed trained to do what the left wants.

I say, we deliberately, and with abandon, do EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE.

If the left wants to eliminate Christine O’Donnell as a political threat.

I say: We build her up to be more, than they ever feared.

That’s where I’m coming from. I’m fed up with liberals being in charge.

I want us to be pushing back harder, every time.

We should be backing liberals down, every time they do this.

So no, I’m not joking. And no, I don’t believe I’m a troll.

I want us to win. With conviction, and with some amount of in-your-face right back at the left.

Idiot troll.


71 posted on 11/04/2010 7:52:31 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (FU TURD BLOSSOM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]


To: Cringing Negativism Network

The problem is that I doubt we can agree on which pieces on the board are worth protecting.


75 posted on 11/04/2010 10:32:12 AM PDT by Melas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

I agree with your entire premise except for one glaring problem

COD is not a political threat to nobody

She is a nice candidate for local or even state races, but she is so far from running with the big dogs it’s not even funny


76 posted on 11/04/2010 11:32:37 AM PDT by Popman (Obama. First Marxist to turn a five year Marxist plan into a 4 year administration.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
"Once they determine who is the current most potent potential emerging political threat on our side, they isolate that individual for mudslinging and attack."

This is the Dick Tuck trick Dingy Harry Reid pulled on Sharron Angle.

He had no opposition in the primary. So, he spent millions to slander Republican primary candidate Sue Lowden, Harrys worst nightmare.

Lowden lost to Sharron Angle, Harry's preferred opponent. Angle became The Reedy One's opposition in the general election.

yitbos

83 posted on 11/04/2010 10:50:43 PM PDT by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds." -- Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson