To: fishtank
Oh yeah? And who would she have been talking to without network coverage? This story is not only BS, its not even remotely plausible BS...
To: sinsofsolarempirefan
I didn’t say I believed it .....
4 posted on
10/27/2010 2:24:51 PM PDT by
fishtank
(The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
To: sinsofsolarempirefan
Everybody knows she was talking to the Enterprise when Captain Kirk went back in time.
6 posted on
10/27/2010 2:26:08 PM PDT by
Eye of Unk
(If your enemy is quick to anger, seek to irritate him. Sun Tzu, The Art of War.)
To: sinsofsolarempirefan
And who would she have been talking to without network coverage? This story is not only BS, its not even remotely plausible BS... Never watch Dr. Who?
7 posted on
10/27/2010 2:26:18 PM PDT by
mnehring
To: sinsofsolarempirefan
That is part of the mystery. It really does look like a cell phone type of something and the footage is from 1928. Odd.
To: sinsofsolarempirefan
>>And who would she have been talking to without network coverage? <<
My group uses a “live streaming” (In early 21st century jargon) communication port running during our “visits”. I’m not really supposed to bring that up, but just as nobody noticed her until viewed with eyes that made sense of it, nobody will really notice what I am saying until the time comes (not in anybody’s lifetime contemporaneous to this post) where readers can correctly interpret this.
Oh, and yes our devices look like what you call “cell phones”, for technical reasons I don’t have the space to get into here.
27 posted on
10/27/2010 2:32:21 PM PDT by
RobRoy
(The US Today: Revelation 18:4)
To: sinsofsolarempirefan
I expect you to be creative, not rational!!!
:-)
30 posted on
10/27/2010 2:32:48 PM PDT by
fishtank
(The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
To: sinsofsolarempirefan; All
Oh yeah? And who would she have been talking to without network coverage? This story is not only BS, its not even remotely plausible BS... Hey...In sci-fi, anything is plausible. If there was an orbiting starship, she would have had coverage...
OK?
52 posted on
10/27/2010 2:44:09 PM PDT by
ROCKLOBSTER
(Celebrate: Republicans freed the slaves Month.)
To: sinsofsolarempirefan
Proof.
Deny this.
I dare you.
:-)
P.S. let's learn to have some fun in life!!!
76 posted on
10/27/2010 3:08:24 PM PDT by
fishtank
(The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
To: sinsofsolarempirefan
Its not a cell phone - its a UFP Star Fleet communicator. I thought that would be perfectly obvious...
158 posted on
10/27/2010 5:00:48 PM PDT by
Little Ray
(The Gods of the Copybook Heading, with terror and slaughter return!)
To: sinsofsolarempirefan
Oh yeah? And who would she have been talking to without network coverage? This story is not only BS, its not even remotely plausible BS... If a person can travel backwards in time do you think that it would also be possible to have a communication device that would allow one to communicate without a 2010 cell phone network? Duh.......
To: sinsofsolarempirefan
Talking to the Mother Ship, duh!
201 posted on
10/28/2010 4:53:43 AM PDT by
wolfcreek
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lsd7DGqVSIc)
To: sinsofsolarempirefan; Lucky9teen
>>a
1928 film clip from a Charlie Chaplin movie premier that appears to show a woman talking on a cell phone
Oh yeah? And who would she have been talking to
Lady to broker: "YES! Sell ALL of my stock and put it into gold!"
216 posted on
10/28/2010 9:00:25 AM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(The establishment clause isn't just against my OWN government establishing state religion in America)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson