Royal by who's definition?
Um, it's a historical fact... you can argue that there should be no kings, that's fine but you're arguing that it isn't royal blood. Historically speaking, it would be, because he was king.
Now that we have the semantics out of the way, there should be no kings. His blood is the same as ours. Off with his head!!! LOL
All the so called royal’s got there by killing and plundering more then other criminals. The royals through out history have oppressed and brought misery upon humanity, good riddance to all who would declare themselves king or queen!