Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: 1rudeboy

Your point is moot to the issue. The dog himself is NOT a “threat”.

In any case, does this apply if she simply stepped off the side of her porch while shooing the dog who has now darted 50 ft from her? Who proves this stuff?


90 posted on 10/26/2010 2:30:36 PM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]


To: the OlLine Rebel

I never said the dog was a “threat,” I said the dog was a “nuisance.” If you cannot understand the distinction . . . .


91 posted on 10/26/2010 2:45:42 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson