“Can libertarians ever make a point without drugs?”
Yes but can you think of a better example of how to fight the court then what the pro-drugies have already demonstrated in ignoring this 2005 cort ruling?
Look I’m with you I don’t care for drug legalization, I recognize that the drugs are addictive and thus rob people of their right to refuses, and therefore it can be regarded as Legitimate for Government to regulate their uses.
The only contention I have on the matter is the fact that the FEDERAL governess has done this when the FEDERAL government has absolutely no constitutional authority on the domestic matter peroid. This is a matter for the state and local NOT Federal Government.
“
lol
How about this: Moving from state to state affects interstate commerce, so the fedgov will soon tell you where to live or tax you for crossing the state border”
The Federal governments twisting and outright ignoring the interstate Commerce Clause is rather amazing.
I don’t need to point out to the common man that moving across state lines while it may be an interstate activity is most certainly NOT an act of commerce. Although it likely result in intrastate(not so much interstate) commerce not even intrastate commerce is certain. The man could be a poor deadbeat unwilling to work(sell his labor) and unable to buy anything.
But as everyone knows Federal logic is all about securing to Federal politicians and employees absolute and unlimited power. NOT about securing to we the people our reserved rights under the Federal constitution.
I think I agree with you on those points. I wish we could get the FedGov back into its specified rubber room.