Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Huck
But most people can't get to that next question---what if the Constitution is fatally flawed?

From George Washington's Farewell Address

" If, in the opinion of the people, the distribution or modification of the constitutional powers be in any particular wrong, let it be corrected by an amendment in the way which the Constitution designates. But let there be no change by usurpation; for though this, in one instance, may be the instrument of good, it is the customary weapon by which free governments are destroyed. The precedent must always greatly overbalance in permanent evil any partial or transient benefit, which the use can at any time yield."

23 posted on 10/20/2010 9:44:54 AM PDT by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: tacticalogic
" If, in the opinion of the people, the distribution or modification of the constitutional powers be in any particular wrong, let it be corrected by an amendment in the way which the Constitution designates.

Sure, all you gotta do is get 2/3rds of both houses plus 3/4ths of the state legislatures to agree. No biggie. LoL.

That's a far cry from:

That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

But let there be no change by usurpation; for though this, in one instance, may be the instrument of good, it is the customary weapon by which free governments are destroyed.

In other words, revolution is good for me but not for thee.

The precedent must always greatly overbalance in permanent evil any partial or transient benefit, which the use can at any time yield."

So the question becomes a) are our concerns about national power transient, or are they a consistent, ever-growing menace to society? b) Is it merely the agents of government at fault, and is the problem correctable through a change in representation, or is the problem structural. In other words, is the FORM of government destructive to our interests.

I argue that the form itself is fatally flawed. It is deformed, if you will. The agents of government do the actual work, but all the means are at their disposal. If such is the case, then we possess the right to alter or abolish it, amendment or not.

24 posted on 10/20/2010 9:55:36 AM PDT by Huck (Antifederalist BRUTUS should be required reading.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson