[Doogle]

....does the ruling allow physical retaliation for persistent unwanted advances?

[behzinlea]

Think about those small, intimate, two cadet rooms in the military academies. Will a straight cadet be forced to room with a gay cadet? Will two gay cadets be assigned together? Think about how well that is likely to work out. The safest arrangement would be to assign a lesbian cadet and a gay cadet to the same room.

In the final analysis, if any of those arrangements are on the table, logically there is no reason why a straight female cadet could not be forced to room with a straight male cadet.

Good order and discipline just took a long walk over a short pier. This is beyond asinine.

[Truth29]

"....does the ruling allow physical retaliation for persistent unwanted advances?"

Of course not. In fact rejection of such advances could be evidence of discriminatory motive and subject the cadet to discipline and reeducation. only semi sarcasm flag.

[StonyBurk]

Every one of my Bibles say they who do such abomination are worthy of death. and American history teaches that once upon a time American law makers understood no law contrary to the Laws dictated by God,Himself-were well made/valid. I suspect the Military may gain a few gay activists but lose a lot more
Barry Winchells( whom I believe was not killed because he was gay— but because the murderer thought it wrong that someone perceived as gay had been rewarded) A very dark day for America.

[ArrogantBustard]

...does the ruling allow physical retaliation for persistent unwanted advances?

Allow?

ALLOW???

What is this "allow", of which you speak?

"Oops! Seaman Faggot fell down the ladder ... bummer!"

[PatrioticAll]

This website is going to tally all of the problems that this repeal will cause:

http://www.enormousconsequences.com/

All we need to do is wait, and see the evidence as it happens.