Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: melstew
and the premise is not that global warming is false, but rather that some level of skepticism must be embraced.

Clear something up for me.

Do you mean natural global warming or anthropogenic global warming?

26 posted on 10/13/2010 5:04:50 PM PDT by PROCON (20 More Days Until Independence Day, Woo-Hoo!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: PROCON

My view is that natural climate fluctuation is a fact, and that there are reasons to be concerned about anthropogenic impacts of massive GHG emissions. Our understanding of the interactive roles of volcanos, aerosol pollutants, feedback loops, GHGs, El Nino, and solar variance is still in its early adolescence. Jacques Chirac and others have conceded that the concept of AGW is being used as a vehicle to create global governance. I do have concerns about AGW, but am also very concerned that its certainty is exagerated, healthy skepticism is marginalized, and AGW is used to achieve big government objectives.


33 posted on 10/13/2010 5:17:32 PM PDT by melstew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson