Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

10-10-10-10
10-10-10-10 | David Osborne

Posted on 10/10/2010 7:10:40 AM PDT by davidosborne

Let us have a moment of silence for the 10th Ammendment to the Constitution of the United States

it is now 10-10-10-10

10AM October the 10th, 2010


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 10; 1010; 101010; 10101010; goooh; spartansixdelta
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

1 posted on 10/10/2010 7:10:42 AM PDT by davidosborne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: davidosborne

In seven minutes, it will be 10-10-10-10-10 (10:10 am)


2 posted on 10/10/2010 7:14:06 AM PDT by therightliveswithus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne

In six minutes it will be 10:10:10 10/10/10


3 posted on 10/10/2010 7:15:17 AM PDT by screaminsunshine (counter revolutionary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne

In 7 minuets it will be 10:10 on 10-10-10


4 posted on 10/10/2010 7:15:50 AM PDT by Don@VB (Power Corrupts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: therightliveswithus

That time has already passed on the FR servers.


5 posted on 10/10/2010 7:15:56 AM PDT by Keith in Iowa (FR Class of 1998 | TV News is an oxymoron. | MSNBC = Moonbats Spouting Nothing But Crap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: therightliveswithus

FR time is 10 mins fast.. I tried to get it posted at 10:10:10 missed it by 30 seconds


6 posted on 10/10/2010 7:16:08 AM PDT by davidosborne (I am SpartanSixDelta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne

Drat...well, you can always retry in 12 hours


7 posted on 10/10/2010 7:18:36 AM PDT by therightliveswithus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne

8 posted on 10/10/2010 7:19:17 AM PDT by humblegunner (Pablo is very wily)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

Hmm...


9 posted on 10/10/2010 7:20:59 AM PDT by patton (Obama has replaced "Res Publica" with "Quod licet Jovi non licet bovi.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: patton

Darn. off by :49


10 posted on 10/10/2010 7:21:37 AM PDT by patton (Obama has replaced "Res Publica" with "Quod licet Jovi non licet bovi.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne

That’s just what it’s worth too. Since it is a completely useless and meaningless amendment, silence is a perfect tribute.


11 posted on 10/10/2010 7:24:52 AM PDT by Huck (We need the spirit of '76, not the spirit of '87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huck

precisely my point in posting this tribute


12 posted on 10/10/2010 7:25:50 AM PDT by davidosborne (I am SpartanSixDelta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne
ACTUAL TEXT: 10th Ammendment to the Constitution of the United States

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

October 10th, 2010 at 10AM TRANSLATION (sadly)

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively whim of the Supreme Court of the United States, or to the people. politicians in Washington, DC

We can change that if we get up and GOOOOH !!!


13 posted on 10/10/2010 7:35:52 AM PDT by davidosborne (I am SpartanSixDelta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne
The first version of the amendment said "not expressly delegated." The old Articles of Confederation conferred expressly delegated powers. That amendment was rejected, and instead the toothless, worthless, superfluous 10th amendment was passed instead.

People need to understand the difference between expressly delegated powers, and implied powers. A simple review of the first few years under our Constitution would do the trick.

The big government crowd intentionally made this shift from expressly delegated to implied powers. Expressly delegated powers were a hassle. Too limiting. They wanted a big strong government, and they were sick of the individual states being a pain in the neck.

Take implied powers, combine it with the supreme Judiciary,and you have the mess we now see. Two fatal flaws in our Constitution. Until those flaws are repaired, we shall not know limited government.

14 posted on 10/10/2010 7:38:25 AM PDT by Huck (We need the spirit of '76, not the spirit of '87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne

Yes, and that translation has been in effect since the Washington Administration—since the first Congress. It’s nothing new. It’s exactly what the framers created.


15 posted on 10/10/2010 7:39:35 AM PDT by Huck (We need the spirit of '76, not the spirit of '87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Huck

Not so much my FRiend.. have you forgotten the Civil War?


16 posted on 10/10/2010 7:43:00 AM PDT by davidosborne (I am SpartanSixDelta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne

The American Civil War (1861–1865), also known as the War Between the States (among other names), was a civil war in the United States of America. Eleven Southern slave states declared their secession from the United States and formed the Confederate States of America, also known as “the Confederacy.” Led by Jefferson Davis, the Confederacy fought against the United States (the Union), which was supported by all the free states (where slavery had been abolished) and by five slave states that became known as the border states.


17 posted on 10/10/2010 7:47:56 AM PDT by davidosborne (I am SpartanSixDelta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne
... was a civil war in the United States of America.

Well, no. Unless you believe breakaway southern states sought to gain control of the United States by doing so.

You might as well call the American Revolution a civil war.

18 posted on 10/10/2010 7:54:43 AM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne

The 10th amendment had long since been proven a nullity long before the 1861. In fact, the Civil War underlines just how devoid of meaning the 10th amendment is. The 10th amendment adds nothing at all to the Constitution. It’s meaningless. This was already evident in the 1790s.


19 posted on 10/10/2010 7:57:05 AM PDT by Huck (We need the spirit of '76, not the spirit of '87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

Is this going to turn into a Civil war thread?


20 posted on 10/10/2010 7:58:23 AM PDT by Huck (We need the spirit of '76, not the spirit of '87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson