Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: prisoner6

Sourced, but, if this hypothesis is accurate, then why was the dialog in Dickens’ writing praised for so accurately presenting the nuances of the various regional dialects (a skill he developed while serving in some capacity as government reporter, where he could tell the region of a speaker by the accent)? Those sorts of nuances don’t develop in merely half a century.

I’m not saying that this is not possible, it is. But it is far more likely that the early colonists spoke the English they came here with and that the “America” dialect commenced when immigration began in earnest and Americans had been here for several generations. Thus, it is far more likely that we did, in fact, diverge from the English accent into an amalgamation of dialects from various immigrant accents.


5 posted on 10/09/2010 8:15:43 AM PDT by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (Prepare for survival.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Ghost of Philip Marlowe

Don’t forget, tho — usually the ‘colonies’ have kept some of the old word/ old wayss. It’s true in Spanish, anyway.


23 posted on 10/09/2010 8:32:47 AM PDT by bboop (Stealth Tutor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Ghost of Philip Marlowe; SunkenCiv; All

Boston certainly has the soft R sound. Back in revolutionary times almost half the population was German speaking, what influence did this have on our speech? I have been researching a book on the Revolutionary and post revolutionary period. There Scots immigrants were described as having a thick Scottish accent. My source book was printed in 1850 based on a 40 year collection of anecdotes.


150 posted on 10/09/2010 7:30:49 PM PDT by gleeaikin (question authority)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson