Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Maverick68

No, she was destroying private property.


24 posted on 10/08/2010 1:07:34 PM PDT by ozidar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: ozidar

The museum gets city funds so it should not have had any religous paintings to begin with. She was just enforcing Supreme Court rulings and doing the work of the ACLU.


43 posted on 10/08/2010 2:02:38 PM PDT by Bulldawg Fan (Victory is the last thing leftists and their fellow Defeatists want.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: ozidar

“she was destroying private property.”

Not as bad as blaspheming the Lord God.


59 posted on 10/09/2010 4:24:00 PM PDT by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson