LOL, no official definition of marriage, then no marriage.
Letting “people and churches” define marriage means that everything under the sun will be called marriage, which means of course that “MARRIAGE” would no longer exist, but of course the left, the media, the school unions would squeeze out every drop of perverted usage, and cultural educative, bit of propaganda from that cherished word before it eventually disappeared from our language.
Normal people and Christians would have to invent an entirely new word to describe “MARRIAGE” but even that would be taken by the perverts if it became common, and they would start mainstreaming their own use of it, until that word meant nothing.
With no official, enforced definition of marriage, then marriage would no longer exist.
Which is why, of course, that marriage has existed and was defined as a union of a man and a woman since antiquity and long before there was any "official, enforced" definition. /sarcasm off
The only "official" definition of anything comes from our Creator, thinking that somehow you we need the government to define marriage in order for it to "exist" is a sad indication of how far people have been mislead to believe that the government is the granter of rights, or is necessary for ordinary life to proceed. Do you really think people would no longer fall in love and get married if they didn't have to go to the county clerk's office and fill out a form first?
Can't agree. I'd be every bit as married without an official definition of marriage. Nothing would change at home.
Which is exactly what homosexual activists want. To destroy the old fashioned concepts of marriage and family.
Your faith is so weak you need GOVERNMENT to help you follow it?
You have bigger issues.