Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Woman seeks damages after dog attack
stclairrecord ^ | 9/29/2010 | Andy Heddiger

Posted on 09/29/2010 9:35:16 AM PDT by JoeProBono

A woman says she suffered permanent damage to her right hand and arm after she was attacked by a Black Labrador named Tank.

Trena Wells filed a lawsuit on Sept. 14 in Madison County Circuit Court against Matthew and Amy Cooper of Moro.

Wells says she was a guest in the Coopers' home at 515 West Moro Dr. when the couples' Labrador retriever Tank escaped from the back yard and ran onto Moro Drive. The dog was struck around 3:30 p.m. by a white truck. Wells says the dog then ran back into the Cooper's home and attacked and bit her.

In Wells' suit, she claims the Cooper's should have known about and warned her of the dog's vicious nature. She claims they were negligent in not restraining, training, removing or preventing the dog from biting her.

In an additional count of the suit, Wells blames the Coopers for not following an Illinois statute that makes the owners of an animal responsible for damages when a lawful visitor who is acting peacefully is injured by the animal.

Wells also claims the Coopers were negligent in allowing their dog access to their property in a way that made their home unsafe.

Wells says she suffered severe, permanent damage to her right hand, thumb and right arm. She says she incurred medical expenses of $21,000, and suffered emotional distress and depression because of the incident.

She also claims lost wages.

In her complaint, Wells seeks a judgment of more than $50,000, plus costs on all four counts.

Zane T. Cagle of the Cagle Law Firm will be representing her.

Madison County Circuit Court case number: 10-L-952.


TOPICS: Pets/Animals
KEYWORDS: dog; lab; labrador; labradorretriever; labs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: freedumb2003
That brings up another intervening cause that I didn't notice until I re-read the story and saw that he had escaped from the back yard.

How the dog escaped makes a difference. Somebody left a gate open, that's probably negligence (unless the guest did it, then we've got contributory/comparative negligence). But if he scaled the fence or otherwise got out on his own (and had never done that before) it's a whole different story.

21 posted on 09/29/2010 10:22:19 AM PDT by AnAmericanMother (Ministrix of ye Chasse, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

I know someone who’s not getting a Thanksgiving invitation this year.


22 posted on 09/29/2010 10:22:32 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mister Da
Where did you get that info?

Just knowledge of human nature and dog behavior. Labs as a general rule aren't biters unless they are attacked. A dog injured by a truck is going to bite, but he's not going to go LOOKING for somebody to bite. Most likely scenario is that she rushed to help him and he while in pain perceived it as an attack.

More importantly, the only info we have is from the complaint filed by the plaintiff's lawyer. He is NOT going to mention any contributory negligence on the part of his client.

Once an answer is filed, we'll have a better idea of what may have happened.

23 posted on 09/29/2010 10:25:38 AM PDT by AnAmericanMother (Ministrix of ye Chasse, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono
A woman says she suffered permanent damage to her right hand and arm after she was attacked by a Black Labrador

She didn't get enough damage already? She wants MORE?

24 posted on 09/29/2010 10:32:29 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Ask yourself,where does Saudi Arabia fit on a scale of "passive" to "moderate" to "extremist" Islam?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

The fact that she’s asking for such a small amount of money—just lost wages and medical expenses—indicates that she’s not doing this out of some malicious desire to make money off of the owners. She probably has no choice but to sue the dog’s owners, who may even understand and accept that this isn’t a case of the bite victim vs. them but her insurance company vs. their insurance company. In other words, the insurer is at the back of this, trying to recover their outlay on her claim. And this is what homeowners have homeowners’ insurance for.

If, as a right-handed person, I had sustained permanent damage to my right hand, I’d be asking for a lot more than $50K.


25 posted on 09/29/2010 10:39:51 AM PDT by ottbmare (off-the-track Thoroughbred mare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

This lovely little lad is Palmer, a black Labrador Retriever/Pit Bull Terrier Mix currently staying with The Humane Society of Greater Kansas City.


26 posted on 09/29/2010 10:49:13 AM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet - Visualize)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

“A woman says ...she was attacked by a Black Labrador named Tank. “

That’s RACIST


27 posted on 09/29/2010 11:52:29 AM PDT by Hacklehead (Note to Leftists- We Will Bury You (politically)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono
The Pit Bull of a friend's granddaughter was roaming free in a rural open range area and was struck by a vehicle. Two women in a different vehicle stopped to render aid to the seriously injured dog (had to be put down due to it's injuries). The injured dog seriously injured a hand on one of the women, and bit the other woman. They sued my friend for the injuries and pain and suffering. The dog wasn't his, but was residing on his property (though the accident occurred several hundred yards from his property). His insurance provided a settlement payment. Seems to me that if a person stops to render aid to an injured animal, regardless of what kind of animal, that person has intentionally placed themselves at risk. Just my 2 cents.

In this case, the situation is different in that the dog attacked a visitor in the home. However, injured animals do act/react differently than an animal that isn't injured. I doubt this Lab was "vicious", but was reacting to pain.

28 posted on 09/29/2010 12:48:28 PM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud Papa of two new Army Brats! Congrats to my Soldier son and his wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoldierDad

29 posted on 09/29/2010 12:52:35 PM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet - Visualize)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

Even if you are very familar with the dog, when they are injured there is an increased risk of being bitten - pain will cause otherwise unexpected reactions.


30 posted on 09/29/2010 12:58:23 PM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud Papa of two new Army Brats! Congrats to my Soldier son and his wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

Well, I’ll have to view this later this evening as my current ISP blocked the photo.


31 posted on 09/29/2010 1:00:28 PM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud Papa of two new Army Brats! Congrats to my Soldier son and his wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Mister Da
The article does NOT say she tried to help the dog

I’m surmising given the dog was hit by a car and ran in her yard.

silly me, maybe she was reading poetry to it

32 posted on 09/29/2010 8:02:04 PM PDT by wardaddy (We are on a roll like I have never seen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SoldierDad

yep...it is with risk


33 posted on 09/29/2010 8:02:54 PM PDT by wardaddy (We are on a roll like I have never seen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

Is that my Lab? That’s the exact look he has when he’s running!


34 posted on 09/29/2010 8:22:37 PM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud Papa of two new Army Brats! Congrats to my Soldier son and his wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SoldierDad

35 posted on 09/29/2010 8:27:19 PM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet - Visualize)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

Well, to be honest, he was running AT my son-in-law at the time.


36 posted on 09/29/2010 8:31:28 PM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud Papa of two new Army Brats! Congrats to my Soldier son and his wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

To get that reaction from Ruby, you have to be holding a mallard duck.

37 posted on 09/30/2010 6:43:51 PM PDT by AnAmericanMother (Ministrix of ye Chasse, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother

38 posted on 09/30/2010 6:47:06 PM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet - Visualize)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson