Replies

Please continue your rants. Do you get your drugs from the same doctor that Scott used?

And do you realize how breathtakingly stupid you make your side out to be?

I may not agree with Moonman62, but Moonman62 makes rational arguments. Meanwhile, this 12 year poster on FR continues on in deep cover, trolling for Obama by saying the Las Vegas Police Department has some trigger happy cops.

“but just pick up a Kimber Carry, shove it into a belt-clip holster with a round chambered, then pull the hammer back and let it go before reaching ‘cocked’.”

No thanks. If I carry a Kimber, it will either be cocked and locked, or with an empty chamber - which is almost certainly the way Scott was carrying it. Even Scott didn’t take enough drugs to try to use a Kimber the way you advocate.

Again with your deceitful strawman approach! I didn't say I advocate doing that, it is just proof that your assertion that it was impossible for him to fire the Kimber because it was still holstered was in fact just your lying to readers. And since you nor I know whether there was a raound chambered in Scott's weapon, the rest of your spittle is just more agenda hyperbole.

The problem with you twisters is, if someone makes any concession you then pretend they agree completely with you and serve your agenda. The LV police screwed up and a man is dead who should still be alive. But their screw up is not the purposeful murder of a drugged man that you try to pursuade readers. There were several problems with the way this incident was handled. But your approach to inveigle your 'don't trust cops' agenda is getting too obvious, prick. [And that 'prick' is a little nettle, nothing more, a minor irritant to be dealt with as one sees fit.] As to your posing as some expert on fire arms, well, you're not what you pretend to be on FR even with your research to support your faux expertise.