Posted on 09/27/2010 9:40:32 AM PDT by pgyanke
They are targeting ex-army now.
They let the crooks keep living that carry concealed and kill the permit holder.
I believe cops like this understand law abiding people are the real enemy they face, they will be the ones that would go after crooked cops. And that these kinds of cops will start taking them out now.
William Mosher should be fired and his ass kicked !
Just to be curious, did you really command that person to touch his weapon? If so, why?
Many of us are curious about that. We know why police do it. I hope it is not the same.
I suggest making license plates.
1)Was that for inspection? To verify that the person is well armed & secure?
2)Like entering a Texas Gun Show, where you have to show your firearm(s) to verify that they are unloaded?
3)Or were you to disarm that person?
Examples:
"I saw Scott's shirt fly up and a gun come out," she testified. "After I heard the shot, I ran back inside and prayed I didn't get shot in the back."
Shopper Dolly Rand gave a similar account. The officer was yelling at Scott to get on the ground when Scott reached to his right side and pulled out a dark object, she said.
"It was going straight up toward the police officer," Rand said.
Steve Albright, who said he has a concealed weapons permit and has gone armed to Costco, was with his wife and two young children when he noticed Scott standing in front of an officer. Scott made an "intentional smooth move" toward his hip, which Albright recognized as someone drawing a gun.
"It was enough of a threat to leave," he said, explaining how he never saw Scott pull a weapon because he quickly spun around and headed back into the store with his family.
I guess the aliens will be coming for your brain as well?
ping
Scott was severely impaired by large amounts of drugs. Carrying a weapon in his condition was illegal.
I haven’t read the articles. What kind of drugs was he SEVERELY impaired by?
It was at a checkpoint in Gaza. He had been identified as carrying a weapon and should have declared it earlier.
I have seen where he was on some medication... you’re the first I’ve heard say it was illegal for him to have the gun. Can you elaborate... legally?
Some witnesses say he reached rapidly for the gun, others slow - but I own the same type holster, and you doo NOT rapidly pull it out of your waistband.
And since it was impossible for him to fire without racking the slide, he KNEW he couldn't shoot - so he obviously wasn't trying to outdraw the already draw guns of the LVPD, was he?
Here is the picture that shows Scott's gun lying on the ground after the shooting:
1. It is unlawful for a person who:
(a) Has a concentration of alcohol of 0.10 or more in his blood or breath; or
(b) Is under the influence of any controlled substance, or is under the combined influence of intoxicating liquor and a controlled substance, or any person who inhales, ingests, applies or otherwise uses any chemical, poison or organic solvent, or any compound or combination of any of these, to a degree which renders him incapable of safely exercising actual physical control of a firearm, to have in his actual physical possession any firearm. This prohibition does not apply to the actual physical possession of a firearm by a person who was within his personal residence and had the firearm in his possession solely for self-defense."
While it's not particularly recommended for a 1911 type weapon, some folks will lower the hammer on a loaded chamber. This was actually fairly common in some law enforcement circles who didn't want the general public seeing them walking around with a "cocked" weapon. Depending on the circumstances, I do the same thing with my CZ75B which is a double action that doesn't have a decocking lever. I'm not sure if the Para-Ord 1911 types with the "Light Double Action" have a decocking lever, but they could also be carried with a hammer down on a live chamber and ready to go with just a squeeze of the trigger.
...certainly it's a trivial point, and regardless, what the LVPD did to Erik Scott appears to be completely unwarranted, and they should be charged with negligent homicide at the bare minimum.
At a minimum, he would still have needed to pull the hammer back. I’ve never met anyone who carried a gun like that with the hammer down and a round chambered. I gather it is like carrying a Colt SA revolver with 6 rounds loaded...
I tried to look it up the other day. The only poll I found was on a LEO forum, and about 5% carried hammer down on a round in a 1911. Scott’s gun was a Kimber.
Actually it's quite safe; the only risky part is actually pulling the trigger to lower the hammer on a live chamber. Of course, JMB designed the 1911 to be carried with a round chambered and the weapon on safe. To my knowledge, Kimber doesn't make a double action 1911-type (like Para-Ord does) so it's most likely, as you originally said he didn't even have a round chambered. In any case, Scott was unecessarily gunned down.
He had six times the normally lethal concentration of morphine in his blood. He had one times the normally lethal concentration of Xanax in his blood. He also had other levels of drugs in his system. Combining morphine and Xanax even at normal levels can be dangerous. He either took an overdose or he obtained the drugs illegally to obtain that level in his system over an extended period of time. Morphine is tightly regulated.
The evidence was given by the coroner at the inquest. You may have to look at the pictures at the Las Vegas Sun to see the slides she presented.
It should be clarified that's only true for the Colt 80 series and subsequent models with the firing pin safety. Older weapons should not be carried in what Jeff Cooper called "Condition Two" (hammer down on a loaded chamber).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.