Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MarkL

There are two pieces: 1) the executive order, and 2) defining possession of greater than 5 ounces of gold to be illegal under “trading with the enemy” laws.


2 posted on 09/23/2010 9:03:46 PM PDT by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ikka

I think this time when they come for the treasure of citizens, they will find it has been lost....like mine, tipped over in a fishing boat on Lake Quinalt.....lost to the depths....about 400 feet I think....I cried for days


3 posted on 09/23/2010 9:05:36 PM PDT by runninglips (Don't support the Republican party, work to "fundamentally change" it...conservative would be nice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: ikka

thanks for the clarification. It’s a real shame that the executive wasn’t ready with that information to throw back in Weiner’s face.

I would have LOVED to see the exec answer Weiner with the question, “Are you aware that it was illegal to own gold in any significant quantity for another 41 years?”

Thanks again!

Mark


6 posted on 09/23/2010 9:08:57 PM PDT by MarkL (Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson