Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Colonel Kangaroo; mstar
That is just insane, Colonel scalawag. You should write a book titled "yankee hypocrisy"..

The [British] slave trade was carried on by means of “factories,” or trading establishments, defended by forts on the west coast of Africa. In 1750, the Royal African Company had nine factories, the chief of which was Cape Coast Castle, with a strong fort built on a huge rock that projected into the sea. It was expensive to maintain these forts and trading posts. In fact, the company was prevented from going bankrupt by an annual grant of [10,000 pounds]. The competition of French slave traders, who paid more for their human merchandise than the English company, was especially formidable since the French African Company was heavily subsidized by its government.

During the first half of the eighteenth century Bristol and Liverpool were the great slave trading ports of the British Empire. In 1750, a total of 155 British and colonial ships were engaged in the slave trade, of which 20 came from the American colonies, principally from Rhode Island. Toward the close of the colonial period, however, there were 150 Rhode Island ships employed in this traffic as compared with 192 English ships, a record to which Southerners pointed during the antislavery controversy.

These ships often were engaged in a triangular trade with England or the American colonies, the west coast of Africa, and the West Indies. To Africa the slave ships carried trading goods, bars of iron, rum –“well-watered” – forearms, lead, beads, and cloth, which they exchanged for slaves. The later were transported to the sugar islands of the West Indies and exchanged for molasses, rum and gold coins. In New England, the molasses was manufactured into rum to exchange for more slaves.”

A History of the Old South, The Emergence of a Reluctant Nation, Clement Eaton, MacMillan Publishing, 1975, page 31

176 posted on 09/27/2010 2:24:45 PM PDT by Idabilly ("When injustice becomes law....Resistance becomes DUTY!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies ]


To: Idabilly
That is just insane, Colonel scalawag. You should write a book titled "yankee hypocrisy"..

You wonder if these two can turn it off once they leave the "office", or does the colonel continue to mindlessly mutter his assigned talking points, while rocker does background with his one man Greek Chorus insults. What a delight for the whole family.
177 posted on 09/27/2010 2:47:56 PM PDT by mstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies ]

To: Idabilly

Yankee slave traders were as bad as anything our country has seen. But the Yankee slave traders never split the country to further the slavery interest as the Confederacy did. People distort the issue when they only focus on the comparison of the worst of the South versus the worst of the North. The issue wasn’t North versus South, but freedom versus slavery.


181 posted on 09/27/2010 5:55:44 PM PDT by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson