Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Immerito

People are on Romo’s case, but he is playing good enough to win. Last week, he WON the game for them if the idiot lineman didn’t foul unnecessarily. This week, Romo played worse than usual, neither interception was his fault. The first was a fluke, the second a deflection. If their kicker didn’t stink, it would be a different game. Their also has been a significant difference both weeks between the teams in terms of what the defense is allowed to do to the opposing QB. McNabb got bumped last week and they got a free touchdown from the resulting penalty. Washington was allowed to pummel Romo. This week, again, Romo gets slammed to the ground...no penalty. Cutler gets the call and free 1st down for the same type of hit. Believe me, the Cowboys have not played great, but the refs are making it quite a bit harder,


25 posted on 09/19/2010 3:55:48 PM PDT by ilgipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ilgipper

Cutler was also flagrantly facemasked on the opening drive with no call from the officials, so it isn’t like Romo suffered any more from the refs than Cutler. The Cowboys didn’t lose because of the refs.


27 posted on 09/19/2010 4:12:43 PM PDT by shempy (BOYCOTT GM & CHRYSLER - support American VALUES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: ilgipper

Playing ‘well’ enough to win. Good is an adjective, well the adverb. “It was a good win and he played well.”


28 posted on 09/19/2010 5:07:16 PM PDT by Doc Savage (SOBAMP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson