[TigersEye]

As a Fox News political analyst it would have been appropriate for him to say "I think Castle would have had a better chance to win in Nov. I am afraid that O'Donnell has some negatives that her Dem opponent will exploit." If asked what the negatives are he could have responded "I would rather let her Dem opponent make that case but I have concerns about her."

End of story. He makes those kinds of statements about Pubbies and Dems all of the time without elaborating.

Instead he laid out a laundry list of terrible sounding accusations which he didn't back up and don't look that bad if you investigate them. And he didn't stop with doing that on the Hannity Show he went on every show he could for the next 24 hours and repeated the whole list of accusations.

When that blew up in his face he responded by doubling down and repeating it some more. If O'Donnell's opponent, Coons, had the guts to go there it would rightly be called a "smear campaign."

But now Coons doesn't have to get in the gutter and level poorly based lowball accusations at her because Tokyo Rove did it for him and got more coverage of it, for free, than Coons ever would have.

[Cinnamontea]

When that blew up in his face he responded by doubling down and repeating it some more.

The sign of a real jackwagon with a bruised ego. And now he's insisting that he's criticizing O'Donnell because that's his role as a Fox commentator. Oh yeah, Rove? So then where's where's your "commentary" on Coons?