"The cost of uranium today is 2 to 4% of the cost of electricity. Our analysis of uranium mining costs versus cumulative production in a world with ten times as many LWRs and each LWR operating for 60 years indicates a probable 50% increase in uranium costs. Such a modest increase in uranium costs would not significantly impact nuclear power economics."
http://web.mit.edu/mitei/docs/spotlights/nuclear-fuel-cycle.pdf
To: epithermal; patton; SunkenCiv; neverdem; narses; sionnsar; cogitator; CholeraJoe; MHGinTN
That is probably the ONLY good thing about Obama’s latest surrender to Soviet nuclear domination by US giving more nuke warheads.
We will have more Pu239 to re-process into fuel. And I hope we buy THEIR newl;y excess Pu239 as quickly as possible so THEY don’t suddenly have any “excess warheads” that can be sold to convenient client states.
I’d rather we begin Th reactor design ......
2 posted on
09/17/2010 2:28:40 PM PDT by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: epithermal
Chernobyl gives reason for pause.
3 posted on
09/17/2010 2:29:53 PM PDT by
GingisK
To: epithermal
More study more delay more grants for academia
To: epithermal
Once-through is wasteful. The fact is, after you run out of virgin uranium, you WILL reprocess. Might as well from the start.
6 posted on
09/17/2010 2:52:19 PM PDT by
UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
(REPEAL OR REBEL! -- Islam Delenda Est! -- I Want Constantinople Back. -- Rumble thee forth.)
To: epithermal
Uranium supplies will not limit the expansion of nuclear power in the U.S. No, that's the Regime's self-assigned responsibility, under the tutelage of their enviro-whacko constituency.

Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson