Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Hodar

“IMHO, an automatic DNA match between the baby, mother and (suspected) father should be required at every birth.”

I think that’s a better plan than the current one, where a woman can name any man in the world as the father on the birth certificate, and he is assumed to then be legally liable for support. Nowadays, men are guilty unless they can prove themselves innocent.


3 posted on 09/15/2010 3:09:41 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Boogieman; WOBBLY BOB; Hodar

if they were ONLY matching DNA I would agree, however, the state of MN is using this for its own research and are claiming ‘RIGHTS’ to our childrens DNA. MN is claiming ownership of it. Its NOT THEIR’s. Could this info be used against a child for medical treatment in the future of obamalamadingdong care? Is this the basis for the death panels? who really knows, all I know is that I don’t want any part of it and want my childrens personal, private, biological information to remain their own, NOT THE STATE NOR FEDERAL GOVT>


4 posted on 09/15/2010 7:03:24 PM PDT by Conservative4Life (Those who don't learn from the past are condemned to repeat it. Elections have consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson