Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: brytlea
I think it’s the “and it should” where you and I may disagree.. I suspect the special interest here is vets.

I suspect that it would be a good guess. And you and GA may have some common ground on that, as it could very well be a case where the Vet's lobbied for laws that benefit them, and not the animals or producers. But, that would be the "next" debate. This guy IS guilty of this crime. A jury will decide the rest.

136 posted on 09/14/2010 1:03:01 PM PDT by RachelFaith (2010 is going to be a 100 seat Tsunami - Welcome to "The Hunt for Red November".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]


To: RachelFaith

Certainly, and I’m generally a law and order type, but I see more of a fine and even some community service. He does not appear to have had any abuse of the animals in mind here, simply a business decision. I wish the USDA would really do their job and police these places as they are supposed to, but they don’t. And there is a movement afoot to police more and more breeders (including small hobby breeders like me who have a litter every few years).


141 posted on 09/14/2010 1:08:29 PM PDT by brytlea (Jesus loves me, this I know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson